Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24362036›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

The potential for immunogenicity of autologous induced pluripotent stem cell-derived therapies.

Zachary S Scheiner, Sohel Talib, Ellen G Feigal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. State of the field: cellular and exosomal therapeutic approaches in vascular regeneration.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary S ScheinerFrom the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, San Francisco, California 94107.
Sohel Talib
Ellen G Feigal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology offers the promise of immune-matched cell therapies for a wide range of diseases and injuries. It is generally assumed that cells derived from autologous iPSCs will be immune-privileged. However, there are reasons to question this assumption, including recent studies that have tested iPSC immunogenicity in various ways with conflicting results. Understanding the risk of an immune response and developing strategies to minimize it will be important steps before clinical testing. Here, we review the evidence for autologous iPSC immunogenicity, its potential causes, and approaches for assessment and mitigation.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTransplantation, AutologousCell TherapyCellular Immune ResponseHumoral ResponseInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInnate ImmunityiPSC

Identifiers

PMID24362036
PMCPMC3931018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.