ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014
Detecting and locating whole genome duplications on a phylogeny: a probabilistic approach.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Using reciprocally retained gene families to detect whole-genome multiplications in plants.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Revisiting ancient whole-genome duplications in the seed and flowering plants through the lens of dosage-sensitive genes.Science advances · 2026Article
- A closed-loop method for precise genome size estimation using HiFi reads.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Whole Genome Duplication in the Genomics Era: The Hidden Gems in Invertebrates?Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- Phylogenomic profiles of whole-genome duplications in Poaceae and landscape of differential duplicate retention and losses among major Poaceae lineages.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Chromosome-scale genome, together with transcriptome and metabolome, provides insights into the evolution and anthocyanin biosynthesis ofHorticulture research · 2024Article
- Genomic evidence for rediploidization and adaptive evolution following the whole-genome triplication.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Revisiting ancient polyploidy in leptosporangiate ferns.The New phytologist · 2023Article
- PolyploidFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A high-quality Buxus austro-yunnanensis (Buxales) genome provides new insights into karyotype evolution in early eudicots.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Dynamic genome evolution in a model fern.Nature plants · 2022Article
- Evolution of complex genome architecture in gymnosperms.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Phylogenomic Analyses of Alismatales Shed Light into Adaptations to Aquatic Environments.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- The flying spider-monkey tree fern genome provides insights into fern evolution and arborescence.Nature plants · 2022Article
- Unlocking plant metabolic diversity: A (pan)-genomic view.Plant communications · 2022Review
- Chromosome-Scale Genome Assembly of Gilia yorkii Enables Genetic Mapping of Floral Traits in an Interspecies Cross.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Potential allopolyploid origin of Ericales revealed with gene-tree reconciliation.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Phylotranscriptomics Illuminates the Placement of Whole Genome Duplications and Gene Retention in Ferns.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Coptis chinensis genome reveals the diversification of protoberberine-type alkaloids.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole genome duplications (WGDs) followed by massive gene loss occurred in the evolutionary history of many groups. WGDs are usually inferred from the age distribution of paralogs (Ks-based methods) or from gene collinearity data (synteny). However, Ks-based methods are restricted to detect the recent WGDs due to saturation effects and the difficulty to date old duplicates, and synteny is difficult to reconstruct for distantly related species. Recently, Jiao et al. (Jiao Y, Wickett N, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang H, Soltis PS, et al. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473:97-100) introduced an empirical method that aims to detect a peak in duplication ages among nodes selected from a previous phylogenetic analysis. In this context, we present here two rigorous methods based on data from multiple gene families and on a new probabilistic model. Our model assumes that all gene lineages are instantaneously duplicated at the WGD event with a possible almost-immediate loss of some extra copies. Our reconciliation method relies on aligned molecular sequences, whereas our gene count method relies only on gene count data across species. We show, using extensive simulations, that both methods have a good detection power. Surprisingly, the gene count method enjoys no loss of power compared with the reconciliation method, despite the fact that sequence information is not used. We finally illustrate the performance of our methods on a benchmark yeast data set. Both methods are able to detect the well-known WGD in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae clade and agree on a small retention rate at the WGD, as established by synteny-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.