ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery2014
The future: taking veterinary laparoscopy to the next level.
Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early-phase laparoscopic skill acquisition in veterinary students: impact of 2D/3D vision and conventional/articulating instruments.Irish veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Training total laparoscopic gastropexy using a composed simulator and evaluating the significant transfer of surgical skills performed in growing pigs in vivo.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Approaches to Laparoscopic Training in Veterinary Medicine: A Review of Personalized Simulators.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Considerations When Writing and Reviewing a Higher Education Teaching Protocol Involving Animals.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
practical relevanceLaparoscopic surgery minimizes tissue trauma and speeds recovery, but its uptake into veterinary clinical practice has been slow. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: Laparoscopy is distinctly different from traditional open surgery and a reduced working area and loss of depth perception are among the challenges that the surgeon must get to grips with. Indeed, it is often lack of the necessary skills, rather than the cost of equipment, that presents the greatest obstacle. AUDIENCE: This article is aimed at practitioners keen to embrace minimally invasive surgery and advises on how to develop excellence in laparoscopic skills. It makes the case for simulation training and outlines methods that can be instituted in practice at low cost and with comparatively little time expenditure. It also describes technological advances that have already increased the success of veterinary 'keyhole' surgery, as well as those that look promising for the future. EVIDENCE BASE: Simulation training has been an intense area of research and publication within the past 15 years. This article draws on that evidence base and the experience gained by the author and her research team, which is at the forefront of efforts to develop laparoscopic training for veterinarians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.