Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24361724›Full record

ArticleActa tropica2014

Evaluation of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB)-Barrier for control of vector and nuisance mosquitoes and its effect on non-target organisms in sub-tropical environments in Florida.

Whitney A Qualls, Günter C Müller, Edita E Revay, Sandra A Allan, Kristopher L Arheart, John C Beier, Michal L Smith, Jodi M Scott, Vasiliy D Kravchenko, Axel Hausmann and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta tropica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Whitney A QuallsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: w.qualls@med.miami.edu.
Günter C MüllerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Edita E RevayDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa 34995, Israel.
Sandra A AllanUnited States Department of Agriculture-ARS-Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kristopher L ArheartDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
John C BeierDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Michal L SmithAnastasia Mosquito Control District, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Jodi M ScottAnastasia Mosquito Control District, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Vasiliy D KravchenkoDepartment of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Axel HausmannBavarian Natural History Collections (Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns, SNSB), Munich, Germany; Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (ZSM), Munich, Germany.
Zoya A YefremovaDepartment of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Rui-De XueAnastasia Mosquito Control District, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Consolidated Mosquito Abatement District · USUniversity of Miami · USTel Aviv University · ILBavarian State Collection of Zoology · DEHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

Outdoor Resting and Sugar Feeding Behaviors of African Malaria VectorsR01AI100968 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BEIER, JOHN C. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Environmental Changes and Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Arid EnvironmentsR01GM093345 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BEIER, JOHN C. · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100968NIAID NIH HHS R01AI100968NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) with the active ingredient eugenol, an Environmental Protection Agency exempt compound, was evaluated against vector and nuisance mosquitoes in both laboratory and field studies. In the laboratory, eugenol combined in attractive sugar bait (ASB) solution provided high levels of mortality for Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Anopheles quadrimaculatus. Field studies demonstrated significant control: >70% reduction for Aedes atlanticus, Aedes. infirmatus, and Culex nigripalpus and >50% reduction for Anopheles crucians, Uranotaenia sapphirina, Culiseta melanura, and Culex erraticus three weeks post ATSB application. Furthermore, non-target feeding of six insect orders, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, and Orthoptera, was evaluated in the field after application of a dyed-ASB to flowering and non-flowering vegetation. ASB feeding (staining) was determined by dissecting the guts and searching for food dye with a dissecting microscope. The potential impact of ATSB on non-targets, applied on green non-flowering vegetation was low for all non-target groups (0.9%). However, application of the ASB to flowering vegetation resulted in significant staining of the non-target insect orders. This highlights the need for application guidelines to reduce non-target effects. No mortality was observed in laboratory studies with predatory non-targets, spiders, praying mantis, or ground beetles, after feeding for three days on mosquitoes engorged on ATSB. Overall, our laboratory and field studies support the use of eugenol as an active ingredient for controlling important vector and nuisance mosquitoes when used as an ATSB toxin. This is the first study demonstrating effective control of anophelines in non-arid environments which suggest that even in highly competitive sugar rich environments this method could be used for control of malaria in Latin American countries.

Indexed as

AedesAnophelesCulexEugenolInsecticidesAnimalsColeopteraFeeding BehaviorFemaleFloridaHemipteraHymenopteraLepidopteraMosquito ControlOrthopteraSucroseEugenolInsecticidesSucroseAnopheles cruciansEugenolIntegrated vector controlOral insecticideSugar feeding

Identifiers

PMID24361724
PMCPMC3944220
OpenAlexW2124733888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.