Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24361547›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience letters2014

Heterogeneity of reactive astrocytes.

Mark A Anderson, Yan Ao, Michael V Sofroniew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Injury and therapy in a human spinal cord organoid.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Astrocyte Enrichment of 3D Cortical Constructs Enhances Brain Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Multiple sclerosis: molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark A AndersonDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1763, United States.
Yan AoDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1763, United States.
Michael V SofroniewDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1763, United States. Electronic address: sofroniew@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Molecular Dissection of Reactive Astrogliosis: STAT3R01NS057624 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SOFRONIEW, MICHAEL V · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS NS057624NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes respond to injury and disease in the central nervous system (CNS) with a process referred to as reactive astrogliosis. Recent progress demonstrates that reactive astrogliosis is not a simple all-or-none phenomenon, but is a finely gradated continuum of changes that range from reversible alterations in gene expression and cell hypertrophy, to scar formation with permanent tissue rearrangement. There is now compelling evidence that reactive astrocytes exhibit a substantial potential for heterogeneity at multiple levels, including gene expression, cell morphology, topography (distance from lesions), CNS regions, local (among neighboring cells), cell signaling and cell function. Structural and functional changes are regulated in reactive astrocytes by many different potential signaling events that occur in a context dependent manner. It is noteworthy that different stimuli of astrocyte reactivity can lead to similar degrees of GFAP upregulation while causing substantially different changes in transcriptome profiles and cell function. Thus, it is not possible to equate simple and uniform measures such as cell hypertrophy and upregulation of GFAP expression with a single, uniform concept of astrocyte reactivity. Instead, it is necessary to recognize the considerable potential for heterogeneity and determine the functional implications of astrocyte reactivity in a context specific manner as regulated by specific signaling events.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesBrainCell ProliferationCell SizeCicatrixGene ExpressionGliosisHumansSignal TransductionSpinal CordTerminology as TopicAutoimmune diseaseGlial scarHeterogeneityInflammationReactive astrogliosisTrauma

Identifiers

PMID24361547
PMCPMC3984948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.