ArticleBehavioural brain research2014
Performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peri- and Postnatal High Fat Feeding Have Differential Effects on Executive Function and Associated Neurobiology in Aged Male and Female Mice.Aging cell · 2025Article
- Valence-Driven Cognitive Flexibility: Neurochemical and Circuit-Level Insights from Animal Models and Their Relevance to Schizophrenia.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Article
- Visual discrimination and inhibitory control deficits in mouse models of Down syndrome: A pilot study using rodent touchscreen technology.Journal of neuroscience research · 2023Article
- Working memory and pattern separation in founder strains of the BXD recombinant inbred mouse panel.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Importance of Common Currency Tasks in Translational Psychiatry.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- Translation-Focused Approaches to GPCR Drug Discovery for Cognitive Impairments Associated with Schizophrenia.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020Review
- Cognitive Reserve in Model Systems for Mechanistic Discovery: The Importance of Longitudinal Studies.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Review
- The Virtual-Environment-Foraging Task enables rapid training and single-trial metrics of rule acquisition and reversal in head-fixed mice.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Mutations in neuroligin-3 in male mice impact behavioral flexibility but not relational memory in a touchscreen test of visual transitive inference.Molecular autism · 2019Article
- Visual Discrimination, Serial Reversal, and Extinction Learning in theFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Touchscreen learning deficits and normal social approach behavior in the Shank3B model of Phelan-McDermid Syndrome and autism.Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Cerebellar contribution to higher and lower order rule learning and cognitive flexibility in mice.Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Translational Assays for Assessment of Cognition in Rodent Models of Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2016Review
- Reversal learning and experimenter-administered chronic intermittent ethanol exposure in male rats.Psychopharmacology · 2016Article
- The continuous performance test (rCPT) for mice: a novel operant touchscreen test of attentional function.Psychopharmacology · 2015Article
- The NEWMEDS rodent touchscreen test battery for cognition relevant to schizophrenia.Psychopharmacology · 2015Review
- Touchscreen-paradigm for mice reveals cross-species evidence for an antagonistic relationship of cognitive flexibility and stability.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attentional set-shifting deficits are a feature of multiple psychiatric disorders. However, the neurogenetic mechanisms underlying these deficits are largely unknown. In the present study we assessed performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task similar to those used with humans and non-human primates. In experiment 1, mice discriminated simple white lines followed by compound stimuli composed of white lines superimposed on grey shapes. Although performance of the two strains was largely equivalent during early stages of the task, DBA/2J mice committed significantly more errors compared to C57BL/6J mice on the extra-dimensional shift. Additionally, performance of mice as a group declined across the three compound discrimination reversals. In experiment 2 we assessed salience of the shapes and lines dimensions and determined if dimensional salience, a variable previously shown to affect set-shifting abilities in humans and non-human primates, could be systematically manipulated. Findings from experiment 2 suggested that strain differences during the extra-dimensional shift in experiment 1 were most parsimoniously explained by a consistently impaired ability in DBA/2J mice to discriminate a subset of the compound stimuli. Additionally, unlike maze-based tasks, the relative salience of the two dimensions could be manipulated by systematically altering the width of lines exemplars while retaining other potentially-relevant attributes of the compound stimuli. These findings reveal unique and in some cases strain-dependent phenomena related to discriminations of simple and multidimensional visual stimuli which may facilitate future efforts to identify and fully characterize visual discrimination, reversal learning, and attentional set-shifting deficits in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.