ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2013
Common breast cancer risk variants in the post-COGS era: a comprehensive review.
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel breast cancer susceptibility loci under linkage peaks identified in African ancestry consortia.Human molecular genetics · 2024Pooled it
- The largest genome-wide association study for breast cancer in Taiwanese Han population.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Breast cancer prediction model based on clinical and biochemical characteristics: clinical data from patients with benign and malignant breast tumors from a single center in South China.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Psychological and health behaviour outcomes following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: a mini-review of the literature.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2022Review
- Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Approaches.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2022Article
- Sequencing of Chromosomal Locus 6q25.1 Revealed Two Significant SNPs rs2046210 and rs2046211 Associated with Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study in Egyptian Women.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- Genetic Susceptibility to Breast Cancer in Sub-Saharan African Populations.JCO global oncology · 2021Article
- Association of a Polygenic Risk Score With Breast Cancer Among Women Carriers of High- and Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- DNA repair genes hOGG1, XRCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms and their molecular mapping in breast cancer patients from India.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Prediagnosis aspirin use, DNA methylation, and mortality after breast cancer: A population-based study.Cancer · 2019Article
- High-risk women's risk perception after receiving personalized polygenic breast cancer risk information.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- A genome wide SNP genotyping study in the Tunisian population: specific reporting on a subset of common breast cancer risk loci.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Germline Variants in Mexican Patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility.Cancers · 2018Article
- Family specific genetic predisposition to breast cancer: results from Tunisian whole exome sequenced breast cancer cases.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Improving breast cancer risk prediction by using demographic risk factors, abnormality features on mammograms and genetic variants.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Specific killing of DNA damage-response deficient cells with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase.DNA repair · 2017Article
- CURRENT CONCEPTS ON THE GENETIC FACTORS IN ROTATOR CUFF PATHOLOGY AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS FOR SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPISTS.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2017Article
- Racial Differences in Cancer Susceptibility and Survival: More Than the Color of the Skin?Trends in cancer · 2017Review
- Multigene testing of moderate-risk genes: be mindful of the missense.Journal of medical genetics · 2016Article
- Discriminatory power of common genetic variants in personalized breast cancer diagnosis.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer has a strong heritable component, with approximately 15% of cases exhibiting a family history of the disease. Mutations in genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 lead to autosomal dominant inherited cancer susceptibility and confer a high lifetime risk of breast cancers. Identification of mutations in these genes through clinical genetic testing enables patients to undergo screening and prevention strategies, some of which provide overall survival benefit. In addition, a number of mutant alleles have been identified in genes such as CHEK2, PALB2, ATM and BRIP1, which often display incomplete penetrance and confer moderate lifetime risks of breast cancer. Studies are underway to determine how to use the identification of mutations in these genes to guide clinical practice. Altogether, however, mutations in high and moderate penetrance genes probably account for approximately 25% of familial breast cancer risk; the remainder may be due to mutations in as yet unidentified genes or lower penetrance variants. Common low penetrance alleles, which have been mainly identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), are generally present at 10 to 50% population frequencies and confer less than 1.5-fold increases in breast cancer risk. A number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified and risk associations extensively replicated in populations of European ancestry, the number of which has substantially increased as a result of GWAS performed by the Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study consortium. It is now estimated that 28% of familial breast cancer risk is explained by common breast cancer susceptibility loci. In some cases, SNP associations may be specific to different subsets of women with breast cancer, as defined by ethnicity or estrogen receptor status. Although not yet clinically established, it is hoped that identification of common risk variants may eventually allow identification of women at higher risk of breast cancer and enable implementation of breast cancer screening, prevention or treatment strategies that provide clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.