Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24359592›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2014

The association between EHRs and care coordination varies by team cohesion.

Ilana Graetz, Mary Reed, Stephen M Shortell, Thomas G Rundall, Jim Bellows, John Hsu

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Teaming up in primary care: Membership boundaries, interdependence, and coordination.JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Electronic health records and support for primary care teamwork.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ilana GraetzDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
Mary Reed
Stephen M Shortell
Thomas G Rundall
Jim Bellows
John Hsu
Berkeley Public Health Division · USKaiser Permanente · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Impact of Integrated Patient-Facing Health IT Tools on Quality and Resource Use for Patients with DiabetesR01DK085070 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REED, MARY · 2010 to 2019
$4.4M
Impact of Health Information Technology on Clinical CareR01HS015280 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HSU, JOHN · 2004 to 2006
$497k
EHR use and care coordinationR36HS021082 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GRAETZ, ILANA · 2011 to 2011
$41k
AHRQ HHS 1R36HS021082-01AHRQ HHS R01 HS015280AHRQ HHS R01HS015280AHRQ HHS R36 HS021082NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085070NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK085070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether primary care team cohesion changes the association between using an integrated outpatient-inpatient electronic health record (EHR) and clinician-rated care coordination across delivery sites. STUDY

designSelf-administered surveys of primary care clinicians in a large integrated delivery system, collected in 2005 (N=565), 2006 (N=678), and 2008 (N=626) during the staggered implementation of an integrated EHR (2005-2010), including validated questions on team cohesion. Using multivariable regression, we examined the combined effect of EHR use and team cohesion on three dimensions of care coordination across delivery sites: access to timely and complete information, treatment agreement, and responsibility agreement. PRINCIPAL

findingsAmong clinicians working in teams with higher cohesion, EHR use was associated with significant improvements in reported access to timely and complete information (53.5 percent with EHR vs. 37.6 percent without integrated-EHR), agreement on treatment goals (64.3 percent vs. 50.6 percent), and agreement on responsibilities (63.9 percent vs. 55.2 percent, all p<.05). We found no statistically significant association between use of the integrated-EHR and reported care coordination in less cohesive teams.

conclusionThe association between EHR use and reported care coordination varied by level of team cohesion. EHRs may not improve care coordination in less cohesive teams.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaCooperative BehaviorElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CarePatient Care TeamPopulation SurveillancePrimary Health CareProgram Evaluationcare coordinationElectronic health recordsprimary careteam cohesionteams

Identifiers

PMID24359592
PMCPMC3925412
OpenAlexW2107944067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.