ArticleBMC cancer2013
Sensitization of human cancer cells to gemcitabine by the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776: cell cycle perturbation and impact of administration schedule in vitro and in vivo.
Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-loading Radio-photosensitizer Agents on Polymer and Lipid-based Nanocarriers for Radio-photodynamic Therapy Purposes: Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Gemcitabine-Doxorubicin Combination Polymer-Drug Conjugate Prepared by SPAAC Click Chemistry: In Vitro Characterization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- CHK1 inhibition overcomes gemcitabine resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell A549.Molecular & cellular oncology · 2025Article
- Harnessing machine learning to find synergistic combinations for FDA-approved cancer drugs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- HELQ as a DNA helicase: Its novel role in normal cell function and tumorigenesis (Review).Oncology reports · 2023Review
- Gemcitabine‑fucoxanthin combination in human pancreatic cancer cells.Biomedical reports · 2023Article
- LncRNAMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Review
- A ferrocene-containing nucleoside analogue targets DNA replication in pancreatic cancer cells.Metallomics : integrated biometal science · 2022Article
- Small-molecule targeted therapies induce dependence on DNA double-strand break repair in residual tumor cells.Science translational medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Inhibition of Protein Synthesis Induced by CHK1 Inhibitors Discriminates Sensitive from Resistant Cancer Cells.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2021Article
- Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 potentiates anticancer activity of gemcitabine in bladder cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- [Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase and Drug Resistance of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021Review
- Comparative Activity and Off-Target Effects in Cells of the CHK1 Inhibitors MK-8776, SRA737, and LY2606368.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2021Article
- Sensitivity of cells to ATR and CHK1 inhibitors requires hyperactivation of CDK2 rather than endogenous replication stress or ATM dysfunction.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
- The DNA repair helicase RECQ1 has a checkpoint-dependent role in mediating DNA damage responses induced by gemcitabine.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Everything in Moderation: Lessons Learned by Exploiting Moderate Replication Stress in Cancer.Cancers · 2019Review
- Combined use of subclinical hydroxyurea and CHK1 inhibitor effectively controls melanoma and lung cancer progression, with reduced normal tissue toxicity compared to gemcitabine.Molecular oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChk1 inhibitors have emerged as promising anticancer therapeutic agents particularly when combined with antimetabolites such as gemcitabine, cytarabine or hydroxyurea. Here, we address the importance of appropriate drug scheduling when gemcitabine is combined with the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776, and the mechanisms involved in the schedule dependence.
methodsGrowth inhibition induced by gemcitabine plus MK-8776 was assessed across multiple cancer cell lines. Experiments used clinically relevant "bolus" administration of both drugs rather than continuous drug exposures. We assessed the effect of different treatment schedules on cell cycle perturbation and tumor cell growth in vitro and in xenograft tumor models.
resultsMK-8776 induced an average 7-fold sensitization to gemcitabine in 16 cancer cell lines. The time of MK-8776 administration significantly affected the response of tumor cells to gemcitabine. Although gemcitabine induced rapid cell cycle arrest, the stalled replication forks were not initially dependent on Chk1 for stability. By 18 h, RAD51 was loaded onto DNA indicative of homologous recombination. Inhibition of Chk1 at 18 h rapidly dissociated RAD51 leading to the collapse of replication forks and cell death. Addition of MK-8776 from 18-24 h after a 6-h incubation with gemcitabine induced much greater sensitization than if the two drugs were incubated concurrently for 6 h. The ability of this short incubation with MK-8776 to sensitize cells is critical because of the short half-life of MK-8776 in patients' plasma. Cell cycle perturbation was also assessed in human pancreas tumor xenografts in mice. There was a dramatic accumulation of cells in S/G₂ phase 18 h after gemcitabine administration, but cells had started to recover by 42 h. Administration of MK-8776 18 h after gemcitabine caused significantly delayed tumor growth compared to either drug alone, or when the two drugs were administered with only a 30 min interval.
conclusionsThere are two reasons why delayed addition of MK-8776 enhances sensitivity to gemcitabine: first, there is an increased number of cells arrested in S phase; and second, the arrested cells have adequate time to initiate recombination and thereby become Chk1 dependent. These results have important implications for the design of clinical trials using this drug combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.