Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24359526›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2013

Sensitization of human cancer cells to gemcitabine by the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776: cell cycle perturbation and impact of administration schedule in vitro and in vivo.

Ryan Montano, Ruth Thompson, Injae Chung, Huagang Hou, Nadeem Khan, Alan Eastman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. LncRNAMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase and Drug Resistance of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan Montano
Ruth Thompson
Injae Chung
Huagang Hou
Nadeem Khan
Alan EastmanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH USA. Alan.R.Eastman@Dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · USCotton (United States) · USDuksung Women's University · KR

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Mechanisms of Sensitivity to Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase InhibitorsR01CA117874 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI EASTMAN, ALAN R · 2007 to 2017
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA117874NCI NIH HHS CA23108NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA117874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChk1 inhibitors have emerged as promising anticancer therapeutic agents particularly when combined with antimetabolites such as gemcitabine, cytarabine or hydroxyurea. Here, we address the importance of appropriate drug scheduling when gemcitabine is combined with the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776, and the mechanisms involved in the schedule dependence.

methodsGrowth inhibition induced by gemcitabine plus MK-8776 was assessed across multiple cancer cell lines. Experiments used clinically relevant "bolus" administration of both drugs rather than continuous drug exposures. We assessed the effect of different treatment schedules on cell cycle perturbation and tumor cell growth in vitro and in xenograft tumor models.

resultsMK-8776 induced an average 7-fold sensitization to gemcitabine in 16 cancer cell lines. The time of MK-8776 administration significantly affected the response of tumor cells to gemcitabine. Although gemcitabine induced rapid cell cycle arrest, the stalled replication forks were not initially dependent on Chk1 for stability. By 18 h, RAD51 was loaded onto DNA indicative of homologous recombination. Inhibition of Chk1 at 18 h rapidly dissociated RAD51 leading to the collapse of replication forks and cell death. Addition of MK-8776 from 18-24 h after a 6-h incubation with gemcitabine induced much greater sensitization than if the two drugs were incubated concurrently for 6 h. The ability of this short incubation with MK-8776 to sensitize cells is critical because of the short half-life of MK-8776 in patients' plasma. Cell cycle perturbation was also assessed in human pancreas tumor xenografts in mice. There was a dramatic accumulation of cells in S/G₂ phase 18 h after gemcitabine administration, but cells had started to recover by 42 h. Administration of MK-8776 18 h after gemcitabine caused significantly delayed tumor growth compared to either drug alone, or when the two drugs were administered with only a 30 min interval.

conclusionsThere are two reasons why delayed addition of MK-8776 enhances sensitivity to gemcitabine: first, there is an increased number of cells arrested in S phase; and second, the arrested cells have adequate time to initiate recombination and thereby become Chk1 dependent. These results have important implications for the design of clinical trials using this drug combination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorDeoxycytidineDNA DamageDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismGemcitabineHumansMiceMice, NudePancreatic NeoplasmsPyrazolesPyrimidinesRecombinational DNA RepairDeoxycytidineGemcitabineMK-8776PyrazolesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID24359526
PMCPMC3878047
OpenAlexW2115337417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.