Trial reportActa neurologica Scandinavica2014
Efficacy and safety of extended-release oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR™) as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Oxcarbazepine add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Randomized phase 2 study of adjunctive cenobamate in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.Neurology · 2020Trial
- Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Factors associated with placebo response rate in randomized controlled trials of antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of add-on antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy: A network meta-analysis.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- Review
- Scoping review of rational polytherapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.Pharmacotherapy · 2023Article
- Neuropharmacology of Antiseizure Drugs.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2021Review
- Efficacy and tolerability of antiseizure drugs.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021Review
- Predicted Efficacy of Once-Daily Extended-Release Oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XRClinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2020Article
- From clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs to treatment.Epilepsia open · 2018Article
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Second and Third Generation Anti-epileptic Drugs in Refractory Epilepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2016Review
- Antiepileptic drugs in development pipeline: A recent update.eNeurologicalSci · 2016Review
- Practice Update: Review of Anticonvulsant Therapy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- Long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive extended-release oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XRActa neurologica Scandinavica · 2016Article
- Modified-Release Formulations of Second-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs: Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Aspects.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of once-daily 1200 mg and 2400 mg SPN-804 (Oxtellar XR™, Supernus Pharmaceuticals), an extended-release tablet formulation of oxcarbazepine (OXC), added to 1-3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization.
methodsThe Prospective, Randomized Study of OXC XR in Subjects with Partial Epilepsy Refractory (PROSPER) study was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group Phase 3 study. The primary efficacy endpoint was median percent reduction from baseline in monthly (28-day) seizure frequency for the 16-week double-blind treatment period in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with analyzable seizure data. Other efficacy analyses included proportion of patients with ≥ 50% seizure reduction, proportion of patients seizure free, and the relationship between clinical response and plasma concentration.
resultsMedian percent reduction was -28.7% for placebo, -38.2% (P = 0.08 vs placebo) for once-daily SPN-804 1200 mg, and -42.9% (P = 0.003) for SPN-804 2400 mg. Responder rates were 28.1%, 36.1% (P = 0.08), and 40.7% (P = 0.02); 16-week seizure-free rates in a pragmatic ITT analysis were 3.3%, 4.9% (P = 0.59), and 11.4% (P = 0.008), respectively. When data were analyzed separately for study site clusters, a post hoc analysis demonstrated that both SPN-804 dosages were significantly superior to placebo in median percent seizure reduction (placebo: -13.3%; 1200 mg: -34.5%, P = 0.02; 2400 mg: -52.7%, P = 0.006) in the North American study site cluster. A concentration-response analysis also supported a clinically meaningful effect for 1200 mg. Adverse event types reflected the drug's established profile. Adverse event frequency was consistent with a pharmacokinetic profile in which SPN-804 produces lower peak plasma concentrations vs immediate-release OXC. Once-daily dosing was not associated with any new safety signals.
conclusionsAdjunctive once-daily SPN-804 improved seizure control in patients with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures. Adverse event occurrence and discontinuations due to adverse events suggest improved tolerability vs previously published data with immediate-release OXC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.