ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Meta-analysis methods for combining multiple expression profiles: comparisons, statistical characterization and an application guideline.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identification of Key Gene Network Modules and Hub Genes Associated with Wheat Response to Biotic Stress Using Combined Microarray Meta-analysis and WGCN Analysis.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Pooled it
- Prediction of potential molecular markers of bovine mastitis by meta-analysis of differentially expressed genes using combined p value and robust rank aggregation.Tropical animal health and production · 2022Pooled it
- Reviewing and assessing existing meta-analysis models and tools.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Low Protein Diet on Modulating Gut Microbiota in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of International Studies.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Identification of Key Genes Involved in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Diabetes Mellitus Based on Gene Expression Profiling Analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2021Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of Transcriptomic Data Reveals Pathophysiological Modules Involved with Atrial Fibrillation.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Statistical genomics in rare cancer.Seminars in cancer biology · 2020Pooled it
- A six‑gene support vector machine classifier contributes to the diagnosis of pediatric septic shock.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Pooled it
- P-value evaluation, variability index and biomarker categorization for adaptively weighted Fisher's meta-analysis method in omics applications.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Brain Transcriptomic Data.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019Pooled it
- Identification of gene expression profiles in myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical genomics · 2018Pooled it
- Protection of macrophages from intracellular pathogens by miR-182-5p mimic-a gene expression meta-analysis approach.The FEBS journal · 2018Pooled it
- A regulation probability model-based meta-analysis of multiple transcriptomics data sets for cancer biomarker identification.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Pooled it
- Searching for a Lifeline: Transcriptome Profiling Studies of Influenza Susceptibility and Resistance.Journal of innate immunity · 2017Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of gene expression and integrin-associated signaling pathways in papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Gene Expression Patterns in Animal Models of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure Suggests Role for Protein Synthesis Inhibition and Chromatin Remodeling.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2016Pooled it
- Meta-analysis derived atopic dermatitis (MADAD) transcriptome defines a robust AD signature highlighting the involvement of atherosclerosis and lipid metabolism pathways.BMC medical genomics · 2015Pooled it
- A ranking-based meta-analysis reveals let-7 family as a meta-signature for grade classification in breast cancer.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Profiling neoadjuvant therapy response in rectal cancer using meta-analysis of publicly available transcriptomic RNA-seq datasets.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- AWmeta Empowers Adaptively Weighted Transcriptomic Meta-Analysis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs high-throughput genomic technologies become accurate and affordable, an increasing number of data sets have been accumulated in the public domain and genomic information integration and meta-analysis have become routine in biomedical research. In this paper, we focus on microarray meta-analysis, where multiple microarray studies with relevant biological hypotheses are combined in order to improve candidate marker detection. Many methods have been developed and applied in the literature, but their performance and properties have only been minimally investigated. There is currently no clear conclusion or guideline as to the proper choice of a meta-analysis method given an application; the decision essentially requires both statistical and biological considerations.
resultsWe performed 12 microarray meta-analysis methods for combining multiple simulated expression profiles, and such methods can be categorized for different hypothesis setting purposes: (1) HS(A): DE genes with non-zero effect sizes in all studies, (2) HS(B): DE genes with non-zero effect sizes in one or more studies and (3) HS(r): DE gene with non-zero effect in "majority" of studies. We then performed a comprehensive comparative analysis through six large-scale real applications using four quantitative statistical evaluation criteria: detection capability, biological association, stability and robustness. We elucidated hypothesis settings behind the methods and further apply multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and an entropy measure to characterize the meta-analysis methods and data structure, respectively.
conclusionsThe aggregated results from the simulation study categorized the 12 methods into three hypothesis settings (HS(A), HS(B), and HS(r)). Evaluation in real data and results from MDS and entropy analyses provided an insightful and practical guideline to the choice of the most suitable method in a given application. All source files for simulation and real data are available on the author's publication website.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.