Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24358455›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in chemical engineering2013

Alternative Non-Antibody Protein Scaffolds for Molecular Imaging of Cancer.

Lawrence A Stern, Brett A Case, Benjamin J Hackel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in chemical engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. High-throughput developability assays enable library-scale identification of producible protein scaffold variants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lawrence A SternDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Brett A CaseDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Benjamin J HackelDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Funding

TRAINING FOR FUTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTT32GM008347 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SCHMIDT-DANNERT, CLAUDIA · 1990 to 2021
$11.0M
Modeling Pheromone Induced Plasmid and Drug Resistance TransferR01GM081388 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HU, WEI-SHOU · 2007 to 2015
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081388NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of improved methods for early detection and characterization of cancer presents a major clinical challenge. One approach that has shown excellent potential in preclinical and clinical evaluation is molecular imaging with small-scaffold, non-antibody based, engineered proteins. These novel diagnostic agents produce high contrast images due to their fast clearance from the bloodstream and healthy tissues, can be evolved to bind a multitude of cancer biomarkers, and are easily functionalized by site-specific bioconjugation methods. Several small protein scaffolds have been verified for

Identifiers

PMID24358455
PMCPMC3863941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.