Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24358280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Gene expression-based dosimetry by dose and time in mice following acute radiation exposure.

James D Tucker, George W Divine, William E Grever, Robert A Thomas, Michael C Joiner, Joseph M Smolinski, Gregory W Auner

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Gene Expression as a Dosimeter in Irradiated Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James D TuckerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
George W DivineDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
William E GreverDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Robert A ThomasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Michael C JoinerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Joseph M SmolinskiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Gregory W AunerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

PHS HHS HHSO100201000004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and reliable methods for performing biological dosimetry are of paramount importance in the event of a large-scale nuclear event. Traditional dosimetry approaches lack the requisite rapid assessment capability, ease of use, portability and low cost, which are factors needed for triaging a large number of victims. Here we describe the results of experiments in which mice were acutely exposed to (60)Co gamma rays at doses of 0 (control) to 10 Gy. Blood was obtained from irradiated mice 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days after exposure. mRNA expression levels of 106 selected genes were obtained by reverse-transcription real time PCR. Stepwise regression of dose received against individual gene transcript expression levels provided optimal dosimetry at each time point. The results indicate that only 4-7 different gene transcripts are needed to explain ≥ 0.69 of the variance (R(2)), and that receiver-operator characteristics, a measure of sensitivity and specificity, of ≥ 0.93 for these statistical models were achieved at each time point. These models provide an excellent description of the relationship between the actual and predicted doses up to 6 Gy. At doses of 8 and 10 Gy there appears to be saturation of the radiation-response signals with a corresponding diminution of accuracy. These results suggest that similar analyses in humans may be advantageous for use in a field-portable device designed to assess exposures in mass casualty situations.

Indexed as

Gamma RaysAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFeasibility StudiesGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRadiation DosageRadiometryReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24358280
PMCPMC3865163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.