ArticlePloS one2013
Development and application of genomic control methods for genome-wide association studies using non-additive models.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Genetically defined elevated homocysteine levels do not result in widespread changes of DNA methylation in leukocytes.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Genome-wide association analysis on normal hearing function identifies PCDH20 and SLC28A3 as candidates for hearing function and loss.Human molecular genetics · 2015Pooled it
- Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic architecture of drought tolerance in maize using yield-based resistance indices and transcriptomic evidence.The plant genome · 2026Article
- High-quality bonds:Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- FastBiCmrMLM: a fast and powerful compressed variance component mixed logistic model for big genomic case-control genome-wide association study.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Copy number variation underlies complex phenotypes in domestic dog breeds and other canids.Genome research · 2021Article
- Genome-wide association mapping for adult resistance to powdery mildew in common wheat.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Predicting male fertility in dairy cattle using markers with large effect and functional annotation data.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Genetic dissection of bull fertility in US Jersey dairy cattle.Animal genetics · 2018Article
- The GenABEL Project for statistical genomics.F1000Research · 2016Article
- Nonadditive Effects of Genes in Human Metabolomics.Genetics · 2015Article
- The effect of rare variants on inflation of the test statistics in case-control analyses.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Risk of false positive genetic associations in complex traits with underlying population structure: a case study.Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997) · 2014Article
- Genome wide association studies using a new nonparametric model reveal the genetic architecture of 17 agronomic traits in an enlarged maize association panel.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) comprise a powerful tool for mapping genes of complex traits. However, an inflation of the test statistic can occur because of population substructure or cryptic relatedness, which could cause spurious associations. If information on a large number of genetic markers is available, adjusting the analysis results by using the method of genomic control (GC) is possible. GC was originally proposed to correct the Cochran-Armitage additive trend test. For non-additive models, correction has been shown to depend on allele frequencies. Therefore, usage of GC is limited to situations where allele frequencies of null markers and candidate markers are matched. In this work, we extended the capabilities of the GC method for non-additive models, which allows us to use null markers with arbitrary allele frequencies for GC. Analytical expressions for the inflation of a test statistic describing its dependency on allele frequency and several population parameters were obtained for recessive, dominant, and over-dominant models of inheritance. We proposed a method to estimate these required population parameters. Furthermore, we suggested a GC method based on approximation of the correction coefficient by a polynomial of allele frequency and described procedures to correct the genotypic (two degrees of freedom) test for cases when the model of inheritance is unknown. Statistical properties of the described methods were investigated using simulated and real data. We demonstrated that all considered methods were effective in controlling type 1 error in the presence of genetic substructure. The proposed GC methods can be applied to statistical tests for GWAS with various models of inheritance. All methods developed and tested in this work were implemented using R language as a part of the GenABEL package.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.