Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24357423›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2014

Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia after stoma reversal: a feasibility study.

Kevin W Y van Barneveld, Ruben R M Vogels, Geerard L Beets, Stephanie O Breukink, Jan-Willem M Greve, Nicole D Bouvy, Marc H F Schreinemacher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: a case-control study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  6. Synthetic Mesh in Contaminated Abdominal Wall Surgery: Friend or Foe? A Literature Review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Review
  7. Stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR): A study protocol for a pilot trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall.Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. [Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall. German version].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Incisional reinforcement in high-risk patients.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin W Y van BarneveldDepartment of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands, k.vanbarneveld@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Ruben R M Vogels
Geerard L Beets
Stephanie O Breukink
Jan-Willem M Greve
Nicole D Bouvy
Marc H F Schreinemacher
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAtrium Medical (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncisional hernias in old stoma wounds occur in one-third of former stoma patients and pose a significant clinical problem. Parastomal hernias can be prevented by prophylactic mesh placement; however, no trial results are available for incisional hernia prevention after stoma reversal. In this feasibility study, we explore the safety of placing an intraperitoneal mesh to prevent incisional herniation after temporary stoma reversal.

methodsTen patients who underwent a low anterior resection with a deviating double-loop stoma for rectal cancer received an intraperitoneal parastomal mesh at the time of stoma formation. At stoma reversal, laparoscopy was performed and adhesions were scored. After reversal, the mesh defect was closed. Mesh and stoma complications were closely monitored. Incisional herniation was assessed at the 2-year follow-up after stoma reversal using ultrasonography.

resultsNo infections occurred after mesh placement. After a median of 6 months, stomas were reversed. Laparoscopy could be performed in seven patients; all patients had adhesions (median of 25 % of mesh surface). In three patients, the bowel was involved; one required a laparotomy for bowel mobilization during stoma reversal. No adhesion-related morbidity was noted at any time. Except for one superficial wound infection after stoma reversal, no infectious complications were observed. After a median follow-up of 26 months, no incisional herniations were demonstrated.

conclusionsProphylactic mesh placement in temporary stoma formations seems safe and feasible and prevents incisional herniation 2 years after stoma reversal.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAgedAged, 80 and overColostomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, AbdominalHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24357423
OpenAlexW2061418260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.