Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24356897›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2014

Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery.

Verena N N Kornmann, Bert van Ramshorst, Anke B Smits, Thomas L Bollen, Djamila Boerma

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03148054 (Computed Tomography With Rectal Contrast and Early Endoscopy for the Detection of Anastomotic Leaks After Left Sided Colorectal Resection. A Single Center, Prospective Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03148054 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Computed Tomography With Rectal Contrast and Early Endoscopy for the Detection of Anastomotic Leaks After Left Sided Colorectal Resection. A Single Center, Prospective Trial.

TypeobservationalSponsorSpital Limmattal SchlierenRan2017 to 2025Enrolled416ConditionsAnastomosis, Complications, Colon Disease, Leak, AnastomoticArmsComputer Tomography and Endoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The importance of rectal contrast in CT assessment to detect anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  9. Colorectal anastomosis dehiscence: a call for more detailed morphological classification.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  10. Computed tomography in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: evaluating mortality rates after false-negative imaging.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Serum cytokines in early prediction of anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Serum Procalcitonin Predicts Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal SurgeryAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Verena N N KornmannDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands, vnnkornmann@gmail.nl.
Bert van Ramshorst
Anke B Smits
Thomas L Bollen
Djamila Boerma
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after colonic surgery. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. An abdominal CT scan is one of the main diagnostic tools in diagnosing anastomotic leaks. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of abdominal CT scanning to detect anastomotic leakage and to evaluate the consequences of a false-negative CT outcome.

methodsAll consecutive patients who underwent colonic resection for malignant disease between 2009 and 2011 or for benign disease in 2010 were reviewed. Patients in whom a postoperative abdominal CT scan was performed to detect anastomotic leakage were included.

resultsIn 97 of 524 patients who underwent colonic surgery, an abdominal CT scan was performed for the suspicion of anastomotic leakage. Overall leakage rate was 10.9 % (n = 57). Mortality rate after leakage was 21.1 % (n = 12). Results from all abdominal CT scans revealed an overall sensitivity of 0.59 (95 % CI 0.43-0.73), a specificity of 0.88 (95 % CI 0.75-0.95), positive predictive value 0.82 (95 % CI 0.64-0.92), negative predictive value 0.70 (95 % CI 0.57-0.81), and an accuracy of 74 %. Delayed reintervention for anastomotic leakage due to a false-negative CT outcome resulted in death in 62.5 % (n = 5).

conclusionThe sensitivity of abdominal CT scanning after colonic surgery is relatively low. A negative CT scan does not rule out anastomotic leakage. Even with a negative CT scan, we should remain equally alert at clinical deterioration as an argument for timely intervention.

Indexed as

Radiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColonColonic DiseasesColonic NeoplasmsFalse Negative ReactionsHumansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24356897
OpenAlexW2040374438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.