Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24356729›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Are healthcare workers immune to rubella?

Eva Borràs, Magda Campins, María Esteve, Luis Urbiztondo, Sonia Broner, José María Bayas, Josep Costa, Angela Domínguez, Working Group for the Study of the Immune Status in Healthcare Workers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vaccination of healthcare workers: A review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva BorràsPublic Health Agency; Generalitat of Catalonia; Catalonia, Spain; Department of Public Health; University of Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud pública (CIBERESP); Barcelona, Spain.
Magda CampinsHospital Vall d' Hebrón; Barcelona, Spain.
María EsteveHospital Germans Trías; Badalona; Barcelona, Spain.
Luis UrbiztondoPublic Health Agency; Generalitat of Catalonia; Catalonia, Spain.
Sonia BronerCIBER Epidemiología y Salud pública (CIBERESP); Barcelona, Spain.
José María BayasHospital Clínic; Barcelona, Spain.
Josep CostaHospital Clínic; Barcelona, Spain.
Angela DomínguezDepartment of Public Health; University of Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud pública (CIBERESP); Barcelona, Spain.
Working Group for the Study of the Immune Status in Healthcare Workers
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESBadalona Serveis Assistencials · ESPublic Health Agency · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCW) have high exposure to infectious diseases, some of which, such as rubella, are vaccine-preventable. The aim of this study was to determine the immunity of HCW against rubella. We performed a seroprevalence study using a self-administered survey and obtained blood samples to determine rubella Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels in HCW during preventive examinations by five Primary Care Basic Prevention Units and six tertiary hospitals in Catalonia. Informed consent was obtained. IgG was determined using an antibody capture microparticle direct chemiluminometric technique. The odss ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Logistic regression was made to calculate adjusted OR. Of 642 HCW who participated (29.9% physician, 38.8% nurses, 13.3% other health workers and 18% non-health workers), 46.6% were primary care workers and 53.4% hospital workers. Of total, 97.2% had rubella antibodies. HCW aged 30-44 years had a higher prevalence of antibodies (98.4%) compared with HCW aged<30 years (adjusted OR 3.92; 95% CI 1.04-14.85). The prevalence was higher in nurses than in other HCW (adjusted OR: 5.57, 95% CI 1.21-25.59). Antibody prevalence did not differ between females and males (97.4% vs. 97.1%, P 0.89), type of center (97.7% vs. 96.8%, P 0.51) or according to history of vaccination (97.3% vs. 96.8%, P 0.82). Seroprevalence of rubella antibodies is high in HCW, but workers aged<30 years have a higher susceptibility (5.5%). Vaccination should be reinforced in HCW in this age group, due to the risk of nosocomial transmission and congenital rubella.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAdultAntibodies, ViralBloodFemaleHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedRubellaSeroepidemiologic StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin Ghealthcare workersMMR vaccinationnosocomial transmissionrubellaseroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID24356729
PMCPMC4130266
OpenAlexW2084196305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.