Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24355931›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Yeast-expressed recombinant protein of the receptor-binding domain in SARS-CoV spike protein with deglycosylated forms as a SARS vaccine candidate.

Wen-Hsiang Chen, Lanying Du, Shivali M Chag, Cuiqing Ma, Nancy Tricoche, Xinrong Tao, Christopher A Seid, Elissa M Hudspeth, Sara Lustigman, Chien-Te K Tseng and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in research on 3C-like protease (3CLRSC medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen-Hsiang ChenSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Lanying DuLindsley F Kimball Research Institute; New York Blood Center; New York, NY USA.
Shivali M ChagSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Cuiqing MaLindsley F Kimball Research Institute; New York Blood Center; New York, NY USA.
Nancy TricocheLindsley F Kimball Research Institute; New York Blood Center; New York, NY USA.
Xinrong TaoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology; University of Texas Medical Branch; Galveston, TX USA.
Christopher A SeidSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Elissa M HudspethSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Sara LustigmanLindsley F Kimball Research Institute; New York Blood Center; New York, NY USA.
Chien-Te K TsengDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology; University of Texas Medical Branch; Galveston, TX USA.
Maria Elena BottazziSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Peter J HotezSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Bin ZhanSabin Vaccine Institute and Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development; National School of Tropical Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX USA.
Shibo JiangLindsley F Kimball Research Institute; New York Blood Center; New York, NY USA; Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology of MOE/MOH; Shanghai Medical College and Institute of Medical Microbiology; Fudan University; Shanghai, PR China.
New York Proton Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USTexas Children's Hospital · USGalveston College · USNew York Blood Center · USSabin Vaccine Institute · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Health, Safety and Training ServicesUC7AI070083 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI HOLBROOK, MICHAEL R · 2006 to 2010
$49.5M
RBD recombinant protein-based SARS vaccine for biodefenseR01AI098775 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BOTTAZZI, MARIA ELENA, HOTEZ, PETER J · 2012 to 2016
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098775NIAID NIH HHS R01AI098775NIAID NIH HHS UC7 AI070083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of vaccines for preventing a future pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and for biodefense preparedness is urgently needed. Our previous studies have shown that a candidate SARS vaccine antigen consisting of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV spike protein can induce potent neutralizing antibody responses and protection against SARS-CoV challenge in vaccinated animals. To optimize expression conditions for scale-up production of the RBD vaccine candidate, we hypothesized that this could be potentially achieved by removing glycosylation sites in the RBD protein. In this study, we constructed two RBD protein variants: 1) RBD193-WT (193-aa, residues 318-510) and its deglycosylated forms (RBD193-N1, RBD193-N2, RBD193-N3); 2) RBD219-WT (219-aa, residues 318-536) and its deglycosylated forms (RBD219-N1, RBD219-N2, and RBD219-N3). All constructs were expressed as recombinant proteins in yeast. The purified recombinant proteins of these constructs were compared for their antigenicity, functionality and immunogenicity in mice using alum as the adjuvant. We found that RBD219-N1 exhibited high expression yield, and maintained its antigenicity and functionality. More importantly, RBD219-N1 induced significantly stronger RBD-specific antibody responses and a higher level of neutralizing antibodies in immunized mice than RBD193-WT, RBD193-N1, RBD193-N3, or RBD219-WT. These results suggest that RBD219-N1 could be selected as an optimal SARS vaccine candidate for further development.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAlum CompoundsAnimalsFemaleGene ExpressionGlycosylationMice, Inbred BALB CPichiaRecombinant ProteinsSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateRecombinant ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccinesdeglycosylationreceptor-binding domainSARS-CoVvaccineyeast expression

Identifiers

PMID24355931
PMCPMC4130269
OpenAlexW2081837522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.