Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24355332›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2014

Effect modification of the association of cumulative exposure and cancer risk by intensity of exposure and time since exposure cessation: a flexible method applied to cigarette smoking and lung cancer in the SYNERGY Study.

Jelle Vlaanderen, Lützen Portengen, Joachim Schüz, Ann Olsson, Beate Pesch, Benjamin Kendzia, Isabelle Stücker, Florence Guida, Irene Brüske, Heinz-Erich Wichmann and 35 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early Life Exposures and Adult Cancer Risk.Epidemiologic reviews · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Jelle Vlaanderen
Lützen Portengen
Joachim Schüz
Ann Olsson
Beate Pesch
Benjamin Kendzia
Isabelle Stücker
Florence Guida
Irene Brüske
Heinz-Erich Wichmann
Dario Consonni
Maria Teresa Landi
Neil Caporaso
Jack Siemiatycki
Franco Merletti
Dario Mirabelli
Lorenzo Richiardi
Per Gustavsson
Nils Plato
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Wolfgang Ahrens
Hermann Pohlabeln
Adonina Tardón
David Zaridze
John K Field
Andrea 't Mannetje
Neil Pearce
John McLaughlin
Paul Demers
Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska
Jolanta Lissowska
Peter Rudnai
Eleonora Fabianova
Rodica Stanescu Dumitru
Vladimir Bencko
Lenka Foretova
Vladimir Janout
Paolo Boffetta
Francesco Forastiere
Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Susan Peters
Thomas Brüning
Hans Kromhout
Kurt Straif
Roel Vermeulen
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversité Paris-Sud · FRAmt für Umwelt · CHFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITInstitut National de Recherche en Santé Publique · MLRuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Turin · ITCharles University · CZFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DEMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZMassey University · NZNational Institutes of Health · USNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine · PLOccupational Cancer Research Centre · CAOrszagos Kornyezetegeszsegugyi Intezet · HU

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchIntramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indiscriminate use of the cumulative exposure metric (the product of intensity and duration of exposure) might bias reported associations between exposure to hazardous agents and cancer risk. To assess the independent effects of duration and intensity of exposure on cancer risk, we explored effect modification of the association of cumulative exposure and cancer risk by intensity of exposure. We applied a flexible excess odds ratio model that is linear in cumulative exposure but potentially nonlinear in intensity of exposure to 15 case-control studies of cigarette smoking and lung cancer (1985-2009). Our model accommodated modification of the excess odds ratio per pack-year of cigarette smoking by time since smoking cessation among former smokers. We observed negative effect modification of the association of pack-years of cigarette smoking and lung cancer by intensity of cigarette smoke for persons who smoked more than 20-30 cigarettes per day. Patterns of effect modification were similar across individual studies and across major lung cancer subtypes. We observed strong negative effect modification by time since smoking cessation. Application of our method in this example of cigarette smoking and lung cancer demonstrated that reducing a complex exposure history to a metric such as cumulative exposure is too restrictive.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationCanadaCase-Control StudiesEffect Modifier, EpidemiologicEuropeHumansLung NeoplasmsModels, StatisticalNew ZealandOdds RatioRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSmokingTime Factorscigarette smokecumulative exposureeffect modificationlung cancerpooled analysis

Identifiers

PMID24355332
PMCPMC3895097
OpenAlexW2133924920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.