Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24354965›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2013

Specific cancer rates may differ in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia compared to controls.

Anna E Hosman, Hannah L Devlin, B Maneesha Silva, Claire L Shovlin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02464644 (A Questionnaire Study on Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02464644 nacompletednot on this map

A Questionnaire Study on Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) and Other Medical Conditions, Compared to the General Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2012 to 2015Enrolled2,174ConditionsHereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT)ArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancer and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2014
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna E Hosman
Hannah L Devlin
B Maneesha Silva
Claire L ShovlinNHLI Cardiovascular Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. c.shovlin@imperial.ac.uk.
Academic Medical Center · NLHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait, affects ~1 in 5,000, and causes multi-systemic vascular lesions and life-limiting complications. Life expectancy is surprisingly good, particularly for patients over 60ys. We hypothesised that individuals with HHT may be protected against life-limiting cancers.

methodsTo compare specific cancer rates in HHT patients and controls, we developed a questionnaire capturing data on multiple relatives per respondent, powered to detect differences in the four most common solid non skin cancers (breast, colorectal, lung and prostate), each associated with significant mortality. Blinded to cancer responses, reports of HHT-specific features allowed assignment of participants and relatives as HHT-subjects, unknowns, or controls. Logistic and quadratic regressions were used to compare rates of specific cancer types between HHT subjects and controls.

results1,307 participants completed the questionnaire including 1,007 HHT-subjects and 142 controls. The rigorous HHT diagnostic algorithm meant that 158 (12%) completed datasets were not assignable either to HHT or control status. For cancers predominantly recognised as primary cancers, the rates in the controls generally matched age-standardised rates for the general population. HHT subjects recruited through the survey had similar demographics to controls, although the HHT group reported a significantly greater smoking habit. Combining data of participants and uniquely-reported relatives resulted in an HHT-arm of 2,161 (58% female), and control-arm of 2,817 (52% female), with median ages of 66ys [IQR 53-77] and 77ys [IQR 65-82] respectively. In both crude and age-adjusted regression, lung cancers were significantly less frequent in the HHT arm than controls (age-adjusted odds ratio 0.48 [0.30, 0.70], p = 0.0012). Breast cancer prevalence was higher in HHT than controls (age-adjusted OR 1.52 [1.07, 2.14], p = 0.018). Overall, prostate and colorectal cancer rates were equivalent, but the pattern of colorectal cancer was modified, with a higher prevalence in younger HHT patients than controls.

conclusionsThese preliminary survey data suggest clinically significant differences in the rates of lung, breast and colorectal cancer in HHT patients compared to controls. For rare diseases in which longitudinal studies take decades to recruit equivalent datasets, this type of methodology provides a good first-step method for data collection.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsTelangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic

Identifiers

PMID24354965
PMCPMC3891994
OpenAlexW2133953660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.