Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2014
Effect of primary care intervention on breastfeeding duration and intensity.
Trial report in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06653595 (Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate a Breastfeeding Support and Promotion Program to Improve the Health of Premature Babies), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate a Breastfeeding Support and Promotion Program to Improve the Health of Premature Babies (PAP-LM)
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Effects of Prenatal Breastfeeding Education on Breastfeeding Duration Beyond 12 Weeks: A Systematic Review.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of online intervention mode on breastfeeding results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive health · 2023Pooled it
- Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- The Value of Mobile Health in Improving Breastfeeding Outcomes Among Perinatal or Postpartum Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of e-technologies in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal women: a meta-analysis.Maternal & child nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Telelactation Services and Breastfeeding by Race and Ethnicity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Effect of Novel Breastfeeding Smartphone Applications on Breastfeeding Rates.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2021Trial
- Starting Early Program Impacts on Feeding at Infant 10 Months Age: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Childhood obesity (Print) · 2020Trial
- The Use of and Experiences With Telelactation Among Rural Breastfeeding Mothers: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing to Support Breastfeeding Among Appalachian Women.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2019Trial
- A Cluster Randomized Trial of Tailored Breastfeeding Support for Women with Gestational Diabetes.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2016Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial of a Primary Care-Based Child Obesity Prevention Intervention on Infant Feeding Practices.The Journal of pediatrics · 2016Trial
- Effectiveness of Baby-friendly community health services on exclusive breastfeeding and maternal satisfaction: a pragmatic trial.Maternal & child nutrition · 2016Trial
- Rationale, design, and methodology for the optimizing outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their infants study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Trial
- Women's perceptions of breastfeeding barriers in early postpartum period: a qualitative analysis nested in two randomized controlled trials.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding MedicineTrial
- Using Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children infant food packages as a proxy for breastfeeding status and duration.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe determined the effectiveness of primary care-based, and pre- and postnatal interventions to increase breastfeeding.
methodsWe conducted 2 trials at obstetrics and gynecology practices in the Bronx, New York, from 2008 to 2011. The Provider Approaches to Improved Rates of Infant Nutrition & Growth Study (PAIRINGS) had 2 arms: usual care versus pre- and postnatal visits with a lactation consultant (LC) and electronically prompted guidance from prenatal care providers (EP). The Best Infant Nutrition for Good Outcomes (BINGO) study had 4 arms: usual care, LC alone, EP alone, or LC+EP.
resultsIn BINGO at 3 months, high intensity was greater for the LC+EP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08, 6.84) and LC (OR = 3.22; 95% CI = 1.14, 9.09) groups versus usual care, but not for the EP group alone. In PAIRINGS at 3 months, intervention rates exceeded usual care (OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.21, 6.76); the number needed to treat to prevent 1 dyad from nonexclusive breastfeeding at 3 months was 10.3 (95% CI = 5.6, 50.7).
conclusionsLCs integrated into routine care alone and combined with EP guidance from prenatal care providers increased breastfeeding intensity at 3 months postpartum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.