Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24354717›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2013

The Nordic long-term OCD treatment study (NordLOTS): rationale, design, and methods.

Per Hove Thomsen, Nor C Torp, Kitty Dahl, Karin Christensen, Inger Englyst, Karin H Melin, Judith B Nissen, Katja A Hybel, Robert Valderhaug, Bernhard Weidle and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neurochemical properties measured byJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Article
  16. Symptom Trajectories of Early Responders and Remitters among Youth with OCD.Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Per Hove ThomsenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Risskov, Denmark. Per.hove.thomsen@ps.rm.dk.
Nor C Torp
Kitty Dahl
Karin Christensen
Inger Englyst
Karin H Melin
Judith B Nissen
Katja A Hybel
Robert Valderhaug
Bernhard Weidle
Gudmundur Skarphedinsson
Petra Lindheim von Bahr
Tord Ivarsson
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NOSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper describes and discusses the methodology of the Nordic long-term OCD-treatment study (NordLOTS). The purpose of this effectiveness study was to study treatment outcome of CBT, to identify CBT non- or partial responders and to investigate whether an increased number of CBT-sessions or sertraline treatment gives the best outcome; to identify treatment refractory patients and to investigate the outcome of aripiprazole augmentation; to study the outcome over a three year period for each responder including the risk of relapse, and finally to study predictors, moderators and mediators of treatment response.

methodsStep 1 was an open and uncontrolled clinical trial with CBT, step 2 was a controlled, randomised non-blinded study of CBT non-responders from step 1. Patients were randomized to receive either sertraline plus CBT-support or continued and modified CBT. In step 3 patients who did not respond to either CBT or sertraline were treated with aripiprazole augmentation to sertraline.

conclusionsThis multicenter trial covering three Scandinavian countries is going to be the largest CBT-study for paediatric OCD to date. It is not funded by industry and tries in the short and long-term to answer the question whether further CBT or SSRI is better in CBT non-responders.

Identifiers

PMID24354717
PMCPMC3878347
OpenAlexW2123122969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.