Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24353922›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2013

Neurorehabilitation: Five new things.

A M Barrett, Mooyeon Oh-Park, Peii Chen, Nneka L Ifejika

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M BarrettStroke Rehabilitation Research (AMB, MO-P, PC), Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AMB, MO-P, PC), Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; and Departments of Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (NLI), the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
Mooyeon Oh-ParkStroke Rehabilitation Research (AMB, MO-P, PC), Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AMB, MO-P, PC), Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; and Departments of Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (NLI), the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
Peii ChenStroke Rehabilitation Research (AMB, MO-P, PC), Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AMB, MO-P, PC), Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; and Departments of Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (NLI), the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
Nneka L IfejikaStroke Rehabilitation Research (AMB, MO-P, PC), Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AMB, MO-P, PC), Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; and Departments of Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (NLI), the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX.
Kessler Foundation · US

Funding

Building a science for treatment of spatial neglectR01NS055808 · NINDS · KESSLER FOUNDATION, INC. · PI BARRETT, A. M. · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
Mentoring translational cognitive science for stroke recoveryK24HD062647 · NICHD · KESSLER FOUNDATION, INC. · PI BARRETT, A. M. · 2010 to 2014
$695k
NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD062647NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurologists have a new toolbox of options for neurorehabilitation of disabling brain disorders such as stroke and traumatic brain injury. An emerging intellectual paradigm for neurologic recovery that includes neural regeneration, repair, and dynamic reorganization of functional neural systems, as well as increasing awareness of behavioral principles that may support best return to function and freedom, brought forward treatments based on experience-dependent learning, neurophysiologic stimulation, and a combination of these concepts. In this article, we summarize five rehabilitative approaches to watch: constraint therapy for motor and language recovery, synergy of motor-language rehabilitation, prism adaptation training and other virtual feedback approaches, and noninvasive magnetic and electrical brain stimulation.

Identifiers

PMID24353922
PMCPMC3863977
OpenAlexW1997582375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.