ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2013
Intrinsic and total system performance evaluation for a newly developed Solid State X-ray Image Intensifier (SSXII) detector.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The new Solid State X-ray Image Intensifier (SSXII) is a high-resolution, high-sensitivity, real-time region-of-interest (ROI) x-ray imaging detector. Evaluations were made of both standard linear systems metrics (MTF, DQE) and total system performance with generalized linear systems metrics (GMTF, GDQE) including scatter and geometric un-sharpness for simulated clinical conditions. The SSXII is based on a 1k × 1k EMCCD sensor coupled to a 300 µm thick CsI(Tl) phosphor through a 2.88:1 fiber optic taper resulting in a 37 µm effective pixel size and an effective 3.7 cm × 3.7 cm square field-of-view (FOV). Standard methods were used to calculate MTF, NNPS and DQE. Generalized metrics were calculated and compared for three different magnifications (1.03, 1.11 and 1.2) and three different focal spots (0.3 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.8 mm) for a scatter fraction of 0.28. For an RQA5 spectrum, at 5 cycles/mm the MTF was found to be 0.06 and DQE was 0.04, while the DQE(0) was 0.60. Focal spot un-sharpness and scatter significantly degrades the GMTF and GDQE performance of the detector. A low frequency drop is caused by scatter and is almost independent of focal spot size and magnification. The degradation for middle range frequencies is caused by geometric un-sharpness and increases with focal spot size and magnification. This degradation was least in the case of the small focal spot and almost independent of magnification. In spite of this degradation, the high resolution SSXII with a small FOV may have a significant impact on ROI image-guided neuro-interventions since it demonstrates far better performance than standard current detectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.