Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24353087›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Assessment of the associations between three VEGF polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer.

Guo-Qiang Chen, Jian-bin Luo, Guang-Zhi Wang, Jin-E Ding

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. VEGF +405G/C (rs2010963) polymorphisms and digestive system cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guo-Qiang ChenDepartment of Urology, Second Hospital of Longyan City, Longyan, 364000, Fujian Province, China, guoqiangly@yeah.net.
Jian-bin Luo
Guang-Zhi Wang
Jin-E Ding
Longyan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a crucial role in the regulation of angiogenesis and is involved in the development and metastasis of common cancers. There were several case-controls studies published to assess the associations of VEGF polymorphisms with risk of prostate cancer, but the findings were inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive assessment of the associations of three VEGF polymorphisms with risk of prostate cancer. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess the associations. Eleven individual case-control studies with a total of 5,209 cases of prostate cancer and 5,233 controls were finally included into our meta-analysis. Overall, VEGF rs833061 polymorphism was not associated with risk of prostate cancer (T versus C, OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P = 0.26; TT versus CC, OR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.67-1.76, P = 0.74; TT versus CC/CT: OR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.67-3.18, P = 0.34; TT/CT versus CC, OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.82-1.43, P = 0.59). VEGF rs3025039 polymorphism was also not associated with risk of prostate cancer (T versus C, OR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.16, P = 0.66; TT versus CC, OR = 1.82 95% CI 0.16-20.53, P = 0.63; TT versus CC/CT, OR = 2.00, 95% CI 0.18-22.41, P = 0.57; TT/CT versus CC, OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.38-1.36, P = 0.31). VEGF rs2010963 polymorphism was not associated with risk of prostate cancer under three models (C versus G, OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.92-1.48, P = 0.20; CC versus GG, OR = 2.28, 95% CI 0.90-5.75, P = 0.08; CC versus GG/GC, OR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.67-3.68, P = 0.30). In conclusison, current data suggest that those three VEGF polymorphisms are not obviously associated with risk of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideCase-Control StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleOdds RatioProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24353087
OpenAlexW2051929033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.