Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24352871›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2014

Perspectives of cancer survivors on the role of different healthcare providers in an integrated delivery system.

Jessica Chubak, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Leah Tuzzio, Evette Ludman, Carolyn M Rutter, Robert J Reid, Edward H Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Breast cancer survivor's perspectives on the role different providers play in follow-up care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Survivorship care plans and time since diagnosis: factors that contribute to who breast cancer survivors see for the majority of their care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica ChubakGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA, chubak.j@ghc.org.
Erin J Aiello Bowles
Leah Tuzzio
Evette Ludman
Carolyn M Rutter
Robert J Reid
Edward H Wagner
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

Training and DevelopmentP20CA137219 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DEARING, JAMES WILLIAM · 2008 to 2012
$7.8M
SURVEILLANCE EPIDEMIOLOGY &END RESULTS PROGRAMN01CN067009 · CN · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMAS, DAVID B · 1996 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS N01 CN067009NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035142NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-35142NCI NIH HHS P20 CA137219NCI NIH HHS P20CA137219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe patient perspectives on survivorship care 1 year after cancer diagnosis.

methodsThe study was conducted at an integrated healthcare delivery system in western Washington State. Participants were patients with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer who had enrolled in a randomized control trial (RCT) of oncology nurse navigation to improve early cancer care. Those alive and enrolled in the healthcare system 1 year after diagnosis were eligible for this analysis. Participants completed surveys by phone. Questions focused on receipt of treatment summaries and care plans; discussions with different providers; patient opinions on who does and should provide their care; and patient perspectives primary care providers' (PCP) knowledge and skills related to caring for cancer survivors

resultsOf the 251 participants in the RCT, 230 (91.6%) responded to the 12-month phone survey and were included in this analysis; most (n = 183, 79.6%) had breast cancer. The majority (84.8%) considered their cancer specialist (e.g., medical, radiation, surgical or gynecological oncologist) to be their main provider for cancer follow-up and most (69.4%) had discussed follow-up care with that provider. Approximately half of patients were uncertain how well their PCP communicated with the oncologist and how knowledgeable s/he was in caring for cancer survivors.

conclusionsOne year after diagnosis, cancer survivors continue to view cancer specialists as their main providers and are uncertain about their PCP's skills and knowledge in managing their care. Our findings present an opportunity to help patients understand what their PCPs can and cannot provide in the way of cancer follow-up care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Additional research on care coordination and delivery is necessary to help cancer survivors manage their care between primary care and specialty providers.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth PersonnelProfessional RoleSurvivorsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24352871
PMCPMC4016186
OpenAlexW2071033450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.