Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24352732›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2014

Microbial alkyl- and aryl-sulfatases: mechanism, occurrence, screening and stereoselectivities.

Michael Toesch, Markus Schober, Kurt Faber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Expanding the β-Lactamase Family in the Human Microbiome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. New Insights into theJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unique Features ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The eukaryotic enzyme Bds1 is an alkyl but not an aryl sulfohydrolase.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2017
    Article
  10. Sulfur Cycling and the Intestinal Microbiome.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Isolation and Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael ToeschDepartment of Chemistry, Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 28, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Markus Schober
Kurt Faber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review gives an overview on the occurrence of sulfatases in Prokaryota, Eukaryota and Archaea. The mechanism of enzymes acting with retention or inversion of configuration during sulfate ester hydrolysis is discussed taking two complementary examples. Methods for the discovery of novel alkyl sulfatases are described by way of sequence-based search and enzyme induction. A comprehensive list of organisms with their respective substrate scope regarding prim- and sec-alkyl sulfate esters allows to assess the capabilities and limitations of various biocatalysts employed as whole cell systems or as purified enzymes with respect to their activities and enantioselectivities. Methods for immobilization and selectivity enhancement by addition of metal ions or organic (co)solvents are summarised.

Indexed as

ArchaeaHydrolysisPseudomonas aeruginosaStereoisomerismSulfatasesSulfuric Acid EstersSulfatasesSulfuric Acid Esters

Identifiers

PMID24352732
PMCPMC3920027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.