Assessing the trustworthiness of the guideline for management of high blood pressure in adults.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Correlation between sleep duration and hypertension: a dose-response meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2019
   Pooled it
2. The quality of guidelines for diabetic foot ulcers: A critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.PloS one · 2019
   Pooled it
3. Screening and diagnosis of oral cancer: a critical quality appraisal of clinical guidelines.Clinical oral investigations · 2019
   Article
4. Recommendations for selecting drug-drug interactions for clinical decision support.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2016
   Article
5. Tolerability of Antihypertensive Medications in Older Adults.Drugs & aging · 2015
   Review
6. Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Compared With the Joint National Committee 8 Panelists' Recommendations.Clinical cardiology · 2015
   Article
7. From Profusion to Confusion: The Saga of Managing Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease!Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2015
   Article
8. Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.Cancer · 2015
   Article
9. Sorting it out: what JNC 8 is and what it is not.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015
   Article
10. Hypertension guidances published in 2013: a busy year with more to follow.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014
    Article
11. Increasing complexity: which drug class to choose for treatment of hypertension in the elderly?Clinical interventions in aging · 2014
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as