Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24352632›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2014

Fetal safety of erythromycin. An update of Swedish data.

Bengt Källén, Bengt R Danielsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bengt KällénTornblad Institute, Lund University, Biskopsgatan 7, 223 62, Lund, Sweden, bengt.kallen@med.lu.se.
Bengt R Danielsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn previous studies from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, a possible association between erythromycin therapy and an increased risk for cardiovascular defects was found. Other studies using different methodology have not verified this observation. The finding resulted in a warning for the use of erythromycin in early pregnancy, followed by a marked decline in such use. The present study was conducted to follow up on the previous observations and to find methodological explanations for the variation in results in these different published studies.

methodsData on Swedish women who gave birth during the period 1996-2011 were studied using the drug information in the Medical Birth Registry, obtained from midwife interviews conducted toward the end of the first trimester. Data on the presence of congenital malformations were ascertained from national health registers. Odds ratios were then determined using the Mantel-Haenszel methodology.

resultsA persistent association was seen between erythromycin use and the occurrence of cardiovascular defects, with a risk estimate of 1.70 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.26-2.39), of similar strength during the first and last 8 years of observation. We discussed the contradictory findings of the other published studies and pointed out possible methodological problems that may explain the absence of an effect in studies based on prescription registers.

conclusionsOur study verified an association between early pregnancy erythromycin use and infant cardiovascular defects; most defects were mild. The cause of this association is unclear.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstRegistriesRiskSwedenAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.