Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24352198›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2014

High hyperdiploidy among adolescents and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): cytogenetic features, clinical characteristics and outcome.

L Chilton, G Buck, C J Harrison, R P Ketterling, J M Rowe, M S Tallman, A H Goldstone, A K Fielding, A V Moorman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. FluorescenceExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018
    Article
  8. Recent advances in the biology and treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

L ChiltonLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000000235595644
G BuckClinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
C J HarrisonLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
R P KetterlingDepartment of Cytogenetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J M RoweDepartment of Hematology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
M S TallmanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
A H GoldstoneDepartment of Haematology, University College Hospital London, London, UK.
A K FieldingDepartment of Haematology, Royal Free and University College of London Medical School, London, UK.
A V MoormanLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBMayo Clinic · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USShaare Zedek Medical Center · ILThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 9609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High hyperdiploidy (HeH, 51-65 chromosomes) is an established genetic subtype of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The clinical and cytogenetic features as well as outcome of HeH among adolescents and adults have not been thoroughly investigated. Among 1232 B-cell precursor ALL patients (15-65 years) treated in the UKALLXII/ECOG2993 trial, 160 (13%) had a HeH karyotype, including 80 patients aged >24 years. The frequency of HeH was the same in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and -negative cases, but Ph-positive patients were older. The cytogenetic profiles of Ph-positive and Ph-negative HeH cases were similar, although trisomy 2 was strongly associated with Ph-positive HeH. Overall, Ph-positive HeH patients did not have an inferior overall survival compared with Ph-negative patients (P=0.2: 50 vs 57% at 5 years). Trisomy of chromosome 4 was associated with a superior outcome in Ph-negative patients, whereas +5 and +20 were associated with an inferior outcome in Ph-positive and Ph-negative patients, respectively. All three markers retained significance in multivariate analysis adjusting for age and white cell count: hazard ratio for risk of death 0.47 (95% CI: 0.27-0.84) (P=0.01), 3.73 (1.51-9.21) (P=0.004) and 2.63 (1.25-5.54) (P=0.01), respectively. In conclusion, HeH is an important subtype of ALL at all ages and displays outcome heterogeneity according to chromosomal gain.

Indexed as

AneuploidyAdolescentAdultAgedBone MarrowChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphia ChromosomePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrognosisRecurrenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24352198
OpenAlexW1995250767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.