Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24352057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Designing nanotopographical density of extracellular matrix for controlled morphology and function of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Jangho Kim, Hong Nam Kim, Ki-Taek Lim, Yeonju Kim, Hoon Seonwoo, Soo Hyun Park, Hye Jin Lim, Deok-Ho Kim, Kahp-Yang Suh, Pill-Hoon Choung and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Printable Organic Electronic Materials for Precisely Positioned Cell Attachment.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jangho Kim1] Department of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea [2].
Hong Nam Kim1] Division of WCU Multiscale Mechanical Design, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea [2].
Ki-Taek LimDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea.
Yeonju KimDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
Hoon SeonwooDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea.
Soo Hyun ParkDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea.
Hye Jin LimDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
Deok-Ho KimDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Kahp-Yang Suh1] Division of WCU Multiscale Mechanical Design, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea [2].
Pill-Hoon ChoungTooth Bioengineering National Research Lab, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Hoon ChoungDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hoon Chung1] Department of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea [2] Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspired by ultrastructural analysis of ex vivo human tissues as well as the physiological importance of structural density, we fabricated nanogrooves with 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 spacing ratio (width:spacing, width = 550 nm). In response to the nanotopographical density, the adhesion, migration, and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were sensitively controlled, but the proliferation showed no significant difference. In particular, the osteo- or neurogenesis of hMSCs were enhanced at the 1:3 spacing ratio rather than 1:1 or 1:5 spacing ratio, implying an existence of potentially optimized nanotopographical density for stem cell function. Furthermore, such cellular behaviors were positively correlated with several cell morphological indexes as well as the expression of integrin β1 or N-cadherin. Our findings propose that nanotopographical density may be a key parameter for the design and manipulation of functional scaffolds for stem cell-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAdipose TissueBiocompatible MaterialsCadherinsCell AdhesionCell CountCell Culture TechniquesCell MovementCell ProliferationCells, CulturedExtracellular MatrixHumansIntegrin beta1Mesenchymal Stem CellsNeurogenesisBiocompatible MaterialsCadherinsIntegrin beta1

Identifiers

PMID24352057
PMCPMC6506445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.