Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24351765›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2013

Efficacy of direct detection of pathogens in naturally infected mice by using a high-density PCR array.

Kenneth S Henderson, Cheryl L Perkins, Richard B Havens, Mee-Jin E Kelly, Brian C Francis, Vandana S Dole, William R Shek

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mouse Papillomavirus Outbreak in a Research Facility.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  5. Evaluation of Direct Colony Sampling Compared with Sentinel-Free Soiled Bedding Testing for Murine Quarantine Programs.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  6. Improved Detection of Murine Pathogens Using Sentinel-Free Media Compared to Live Animal Sampling.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification and Treatment of a Storage Mite Infestation in Rats (Rattus norvegicus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  12. A Cross-sectional Survey on Rodent Environmental Health Monitoring Practices: Benchmarking, Associations, and Barriers.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of In-cage Filter Paper as a Replacement for Sentinel Mice in the Detection of Murine Pathogens.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  16. PCR and RT-PCR in the Diagnosis of Laboratory Animal Infections and in Health Monitoring.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  17. Detection of Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus in a Mouse Vivarium Using an Exhaust Air Dust Health Monitoring Program.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  18. Adoption of Exhaust Air Dust Testing in SPF Rodent Facilities.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  19. Comparing Mouse Health Monitoring Between Soiled-bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Surveillance Programs.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth S HendersonResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA. ken.henderson@crl.com.
Cheryl L PerkinsResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Richard B HavensGentically Engineered Models and Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Mee-Jin E KellyGentically Engineered Models and Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian C FrancisResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Vandana S DoleResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
William R ShekResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Charles River Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a high-density array of real-time PCR assays for commonly reported rodent infectious agents (PRIA) to test naturally infected index mice and sentinel mice exposed by contact and soiled-bedding transfer. PRIA detected 14 pathogens--including viruses, bacteria, fur mites, pinworms, and enteric protozoa--in 97.2% of 28 pooled fecal samples, fur-perianal swabs, and oral swabs from 4 cages containing a total of 10 index mice. Among these pathogens, PRIA (like conventional health monitoring methods) failed to detect Mycoplasma pulmonis, Pasteurella pneumotropica, and Giardia spp. in all of the 9 contact and 9 soiled-bedding sentinels. PRIA demonstrated murine adenovirus and Cryptosporidium and Spironucleus spp. in contact but not soiled-bedding sentinels and detected Helicobacter and pinworms in fewer than half of the soiled-bedding sentinels. Of the 4 species of Helicobacter that species-specific PCR assays identified in index mice, only H. ganmani was found in soiled-bedding and contact sentinels. PRIA detected all of the pathogens in sentinels that were identified by conventional methods. Myobia musculi was detected by PCR in index and sentinel mice but missed by conventional parasitologic examinations. In summary, PRIA reproducibly detected diverse pathogens in heavily pooled specimens collected noninvasively from infected index mice antemortem. The inability of PRIA and conventional health monitoring methods (that is, parasitology, micro-biology, and serology) to demonstrate transmission of some pathogens to contact sentinels and the inefficient transmission of others to soiled-bedding sentinels underscores the importance of direct PCR testing to determine the pathogen status of rodents in quarantine and during routine colony surveillance.

Indexed as

MiceSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryFecesFemaleHousing, AnimalInfectionsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRodent Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24351765
PMCPMC3838611
OpenAlexW339377225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.