Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24351759›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2013

Standard operating procedures for maintaining cleanliness in a novel compact facility for breeding SPF mice.

Kenji Sakuma, Susumu Hayashi, Keiko Otokuni, Izumi Matsumoto, Hideaki Matsuoka, Mikako Saito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenji SakumaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Oriental Giken, Tokyo, Japan.
Susumu HayashiOriental Giken, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko OtokuniDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Izumi MatsumotoMerck, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideaki MatsuokaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Mikako SaitoDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan. mikako@cc.tuat.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A compact facility for SPF mice that was not equipped with a large autoclave used disposable mouse cages instead. The SPF clean room was 5.7 × 8.1 × 2.7 m(3), with a breeding capacity of 1008 cages (168 cages on each of 6 racks). We evaluated cleanliness in the SPF clean room under the conditions of an occupation rate of 60% to 70% and typically 1 to 3 personnel (maximum, 4 to 6) daily on weekdays. Personnel were taught standard procedures and received training beforehand. During the 15-mo study period, the maximal concentration of airborne particles 0.5 μm or larger was 1.0 × 10(4) particles/m3 and that of particles 5.0 μm or larger was 5.0 × 10(2) particles/m(3)--well below the maximal permissible concentrations of 3.52 × 10(5) and 2.93 × 10(3) particles/m(3), respectively. During the study period, no mice exhibited clinical symptoms of infection. Testing of 2 representative, overtly healthy mice for 16 pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Helicobacter bilis failed to detect any of the target agents. The current study demonstrates the feasibility of the compact facility for breeding SPF mice in the academic environment.

Indexed as

Environment, ControlledHousing, AnimalMiceSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsAnimalsBacterial InfectionsBreedingEnvironmental MicrobiologyLaboratory Animal Science

Identifiers

PMID24351759
PMCPMC3838605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.