Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24351496›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

Are alarm symptoms predictive of cancer survival?: population-based cohort study.

Alex Dregan, Henrik Møller, Judith Charlton, Martin C Gulliford

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of pre-existing conditions on bladder cancer stage at diagnosis: a cohort study using electronic primary care records in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Observational
  8. Delays in referral from primary care worsen survival for patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  9. Impact of travel time and rurality on presentation and outcomes of symptomatic colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional cohort study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex DreganKing's College London, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, London, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London.
Henrik MøllerKing's College London, Division of Cancer Studies, Thames Cancer Registry, London.
Judith CharltonKing's College London, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, London, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London.
Martin C GullifordKing's College London, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, London, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London.
Primary Health Care · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlarm symptom presentations are predictive of cancer diagnosis but may also be associated with cancer survival.

aimTo evaluate diagnostic time intervals, and consultation patterns after presentation with alarm symptoms, and their association with cancer diagnosis and survival. DESIGN AND

settingCohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Database, with linked Cancer Registry data, in 158 general practices.

methodParticipants included those with haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, and rectal bleeding or urinary tract cancer, lung cancer, gastro-oesophageal cancer, and colorectal cancer.

resultsThe median (interquartile range) interval in days from first symptom presentation to the corresponding cancer diagnosis was: haematuria and urinary tract cancer, 59 (28-109); haemoptysis and lung cancer, 35 (18-89); dysphagia and gastro-oesophageal cancer, 25 (12-48); rectal bleeding and colorectal cancer, 49 (20-157). Three or more alarm symptom consultations were associated with increased odds of diagnosis of urinary tract cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% CI = 1.50 to 2.27), lung cancer (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.90) and gastro-oesophageal cancer (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.48 to 3.19). Longer diagnostic intervals were associated with increased mortality only for urinary tract cancer (hazard ratio 2.23, 95% CI = 1.35 to 3.69). Patients with no preceding alarm symptom had shorter survival from diagnosis of urinary tract, lung or colorectal cancer than those presenting with a relevant alarm symptom.

conclusionAfter alarm symptom presentation, repeat consultations are associated with cancer diagnoses. Longer diagnostic intervals appeared to be associated with a worse prognosis for urinary tract cancer only. Mortality is higher when cancer is diagnosed in the absence of alarm symptoms.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesDeglutition DisordersDelayed DiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageGeneral PracticeHematuriaHemoptysisHumansMaleNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRectal Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24351496
PMCPMC3839389
OpenAlexW2003003727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.