ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2013
Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2016Trial
- Diagnostic utility of fasting versus non-fasting blood glucose: contextualising testing strategies-a narrative review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- A Newly FDA-Cleared Benchtop Glucose Analyzer Heralds the Dawn of the Post-YSI 2300 Era.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Mean Absolute Relative Difference of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Relationship to ISO 15197.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- The YSI 2300 Analyzer Replacement Meeting Report.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Article
- Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations".Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Article
- A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study to Evaluate Performance of the EXIMO™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
- Assessment of analytical performance of glucose meter in pediatric age group at tertiary care referral hospital.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2017Article
- Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2016Review
- Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Review
- 7(th) Annual Symposium on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG), May 8-10, 2014, Helsinki, Finland.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliability of blood glucose (BG) measurements is a prerequisite for successful diabetes management. Publications on the evaluation of self-monitored glucose values, however, are frequently characterized by a confusion in terminology. We provide an inventory of key terms such as accuracy, trueness, precision, traceability, calibration, and matrix effect to avoid future misunderstanding. Definitions are taken from the metrological literature and international norms and explained in a language intended for nonspecialists in metrology. The terms are presented in light of the need to apply generally accepted definitions. In addition, a description of requirements and components for a sound evaluation of BG measurement systems is presented. These factors will also enable improvement in future comparisons of study results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.