Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24351181›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2013

Predicting glucose sensor behavior in blood using transport modeling: relative impacts of protein biofouling and cellular metabolic effects.

Matthew T Novak, Fan Yuan, William M Reichert

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Semi-Implantable Bioelectronics.Nano-micro letters · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew T NovakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 136 Hudson Hall, Box 90281, Durham, NC 27708.
Fan Yuan
William M Reichert
Duke University · US

Funding

BIOSENSOR BIOCOMPATIBILITYR01DK054932 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI REICHERT, WILLIAM MONTGOMERY · 1999 to 2013
$4.2M
Biosensor BiocompatibilityR56DK054932 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI REICHERT, WILLIAM MONTGOMERY · 2008 to 2008
$258k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK 54932NIGMS NIH HHS GM T328555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTissue response to indwelling glucose sensors remains a confounding barrier to clinical application. While the effects of fully formed capsular tissue on sensor response have been studied, little has been done to understand how tissue interactions occurring before capsule formation hinder sensor performance. Upon insertion in subcutaneous tissue, the sensor is initially exposed to blood, blood borne constituents, and interstitial fluid. Using human whole blood as a simple ex vivo experimental system, the effects of protein accumulation at the sensor surface (biofouling effects) and cellular consumption of glucose in both the biofouling layer and in the bulk (metabolic effects) on sensor response were assessed.

methodsMedtronic MiniMed SofSensor glucose sensors were incubated in whole blood, plasma-diluted whole blood, and cell-free platelet-poor plasma (PPP) to analyze the impact of different blood constituents on sensor function. Experimental conditions were then simulated using MATLAB to predict the relative impacts of biofouling and metabolic effects on the observed sensor responses.

resultsProtein biofouling in PPP in both the experiments and the simulations was found to have no interfering effect upon sensor response. Experimental results obtained with whole and dilute blood showed that the sensor response was markedly affected by blood borne glucose-consuming cells accumulated in the biofouling layer and in the surrounding bulk.

conclusionsThe physical barrier to glucose transport presented by protein biofouling does not hinder glucose movement to the sensor surface, and the consumption of glucose by inflammatory cells, and not erythrocytes, proximal to the sensor surface has a substantial effect on sensor response and may be the main culprit for anomalous sensor behavior immediately following implantation.

Indexed as

BiofoulingComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalBiological TransportBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlucoseHumansInflammationLeukocytesPredictive Value of TestsProstheses and ImplantsSubcutaneous TissueBlood GlucoseGlucose

Identifiers

PMID24351181
PMCPMC3876333
OpenAlexW1897164804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.