Articlei-Perception2013
Depth effect on lightness revisited: The role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination.
Article in i-Perception, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Environmental Lighting Conditions, Phenomenal Contrast, and the Conscious Perception of Near and Far.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Equivalent noise characterization of human lightness constancy.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The effect of scene articulation on transparent layer constancy.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Color for the perceptual organization of the pictorial plane: Victor Vasarely's legacy to Gestalt psychology.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Article
- To compute lightness, illumination is not estimated, it is held constant.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2018Article
- Article
- The nature of instructional effects in color constancy.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2016Article
- Illumination frame of reference in the object-reviewing paradigm: A case of luminance and lightness.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2015Article
- Color constancy in a naturalistic, goal-directed task.Journal of vision · 2015Article
- Color constancy supports cross-illumination color selection.Journal of vision · 2015Article
- What visual illusions tell us about underlying neural mechanisms and observer strategies for tackling the inverse problem of achromatic perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
- Lightness perception in simple images: testing the anchoring rules.Journal of vision · 2014Article
- The effect of photometric and geometric context on photometric and geometric lightness effects.Journal of vision · 2014Article
- The effect of background and illumination on color identification of real, 3D objects.Frontiers in psychology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coplanar ratio principle proposes that when the luminance range in an image is larger than the canonical reflectance range of 30:1, the lightness of a target surface depends on the luminance ratio between that target and its adjacent coplanar neighbor (Gilchrist, 1980). This conclusion is based on experiments in which changes in the perceived target depth produced large changes in its perceived lightness without significantly altering the observers' retinal image. Using the same paradigm, we explored how this depth effect on lightness depends on display complexity (articulation), proximity of the target to its highest coplanar luminance and spatial distribution of fields of illumination. Importantly, our experiments allowed us to test differing predictions made by the anchoring theory (Gilchrist et al., 1999), the coplanar ratio principle, as well as other models. We report three main findings, generally consistent with anchoring theory predictions: (1) Articulation can substantially increase the depth effect. (2) Target lightness depends not on the adjacent luminance but on the highest coplanar luminance, irrespective of its position relative to the target. (3) When a plane contains multiple fields of illumination, target lightness depends on the highest luminance in its field of illumination, not on the highest coplanar luminance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.