Trial reportPloS one2013
Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.
Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of sound source localization of masking sound on perception level of simulated tinnitus.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Investigation of Listening Effort in Tinnitus Patients by Providing Similar Peripheral Auditory Function With Control Group.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- EEG signals from tinnitus sufferers at identifying their sound tinnitus.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Improving Audiology Student Training by Clinical Simulation of Tinnitus: A Glimpse of the Lived Experience of Tinnitus.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- The Analogy between Tinnitus and Chronic Pain: A Phenomenological Approach.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Cognitive-behavioral factors in tinnitus-related insomnia.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based electroencephalic diagnosis of tinnitus symptom.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Automatic identification of tinnitus malingering based on overt and covert behavioral responses during psychoacoustic testing.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Emerging Topics in the Behavioral Neuroscience of Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Article
- Amplitude Modulated Noise for Tinnitus Suppression in Tonal and Noise-Like Tinnitus.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2019Article
- Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2018Article
- Sensitivity to sounds in sport-related concussed athletes: a new clinical presentation of hyperacusis.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Right-Ear Advantage for Speech-in-Noise Recognition in Patients with Nonlateralized Tinnitus and Normal Hearing Sensitivity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- Effects of Educational Counseling as Solitary Therapy for Chronic Primary Tinnitus and Related Problems.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Clinical Validation of a New Tinnitus Assessment Technology.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Gap-Prepulse Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle Reflex (GPIAS) for Tinnitus Assessment: Current Status and Future Directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Review
- Animal models of subjective tinnitus.Neural plasticity · 2014Review
- Reduced variability of auditory alpha activity in chronic tinnitus.Neural plasticity · 2014Article
- Behavioral models of tinnitus and hyperacusis in animals.Frontiers in neurology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of tinnitus relies on self-report. Psychoacoustic measurements of tinnitus pitch and loudness are essential for assessing claims and discriminating true from false ones. For this reason, the quantification of tinnitus remains a challenging research goal. We aimed to: (1) assess the precision of a new tinnitus likeness rating procedure with a continuous-pitch presentation method, controlling for music training, and (2) test whether tinnitus psychoacoustic measurements have the sensitivity and specificity required to detect people faking tinnitus. Musicians and non-musicians with tinnitus, as well as simulated malingerers without tinnitus, were tested. Most were retested several weeks later. Tinnitus pitch matching was first assessed using the likeness rating method: pure tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz were presented randomly to participants, who had to rate the likeness of each tone to their tinnitus, and to adjust its level from 0 to 100 dB SPL. Tinnitus pitch matching was then assessed with a continuous-pitch method: participants had to match the pitch of their tinnitus to an external tone by moving their finger across a touch-sensitive strip, which generated a continuous pure tone from 0.5 to 20 kHz in 1-Hz steps. The predominant tinnitus pitch was consistent across both methods for both musicians and non-musicians, although musicians displayed better external tone pitch matching abilities. Simulated malingerers rated loudness much higher than did the other groups with a high degree of specificity (94.4%) and were unreliable in loudness (not pitch) matching from one session to the other. Retest data showed similar pitch matching responses for both methods for all participants. In conclusion, tinnitus pitch and loudness reliably correspond to the tinnitus percept, and psychoacoustic loudness matches are sensitive and specific to the presence of tinnitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.