Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24349411›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Comparative analysis of radiosensitizers for K-RAS mutant rectal cancers.

Laura B Kleiman, Angela M Krebs, Stephen Y Kim, Theodore S Hong, Kevin M Haigis

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular pathways: targeting the dependence of mutant RAS cancers on the DNA damage response.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura B KleimanMolecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research and Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Angela M KrebsMolecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research and Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Germany.
Stephen Y KimMolecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research and Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Theodore S HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kevin M HaigisMolecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research and Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Center for Cancer Research · USCenter for Systems Biology · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 40% of rectal cancers harbor activating K-RAS mutations, and these mutations are associated with poor clinical response to chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to identify small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) that synergize with ionizing radiation (IR) ("radiosensitizers") that could be incorporated into current treatment strategies for locally advanced rectal cancers (LARCs) expressing mutant K-RAS. We first optimized a high-throughput assay for measuring individual and combined effects of SMIs and IR that produces similar results to the gold standard colony formation assay. Using this screening platform and K-RAS mutant rectal cancer cell lines, we tested SMIs targeting diverse signaling pathways for radiosensitizing activity and then evaluated our top hits in follow-up experiments. The two most potent radiosensitizers were the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235. The chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is used to treat LARC, synergized with AZD7762 and enhanced radiosensitization by AZD7762. This study is the first to compare different SMIs in combination with IR for the treatment of K-RAS mutant rectal cancer, and our findings suggest that Chk1/2 inhibitors should be evaluated in new clinical trials for LARC.

Indexed as

MutationProto-Oncogene Proteinsras ProteinsRectal NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorChemoradiotherapyEnzyme InhibitorsHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Radiation-Sensitizing AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Radiation-Sensitizing Agentsras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24349411
PMCPMC3861465
OpenAlexW2141552763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.