Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24349407›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Recall responses to tetanus and diphtheria vaccination are frequently insufficient in elderly persons.

Birgit Weinberger, Michael Schirmer, Raffaella Matteucci Gothe, Uwe Siebert, Dietmar Fuchs, Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Immune aging and infectious diseases.Chinese medical journal · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Challenges in the Vaccination of the Elderly and Strategies for Improvement.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Vaccines and Senior Travellers.Frontiers in aging · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vaccination Coverage of the Elderly in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Birgit WeinbergerInstitute for Biomedical Aging Research, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael SchirmerDepartment of Internal Medicine VI, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Raffaella Matteucci GotheDepartment of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Uwe SiebertDepartment of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria ; Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Dietmar FuchsDivision of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Beatrix Grubeck-LoebensteinInstitute for Biomedical Aging Research, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATMassachusetts General Hospital · USUMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDemographic changes and a more active life-style in older age have contributed to an increasing public awareness of the need for lifelong vaccination. Currently many older persons have been vaccinated against selected pathogens during childhood but lack regular booster immunizations. The impact of regular vaccinations when started late in life was analyzed in an open, explorative trial by evaluating the immune response against tetanus and diphtheria in healthy older individuals. 252 persons aged above 60 years received a booster vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and polio and a subcohort (n=87) was recruited to receive a second booster vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis 5 years later. The percentage of unprotected individuals at the time of enrollment differed substantially for tetanus (12%) and diphtheria (65%). Despite protective antibody concentrations 4 weeks after the first vaccination in almost all vaccinees, antibodies had again dropped below protective levels in 10% (tetanus) and 45% (diphtheria) of the cohort after 5 years. Protection was restored in almost all vaccinees after the second vaccination. No correlation between tetanus- and diphtheria-specific responses was observed, and antibody concentrations were not associated with age-related changes in the T cell repertoire, inflammatory parameters, or CMV-seropositivity suggesting that there was no general biological "non-responder type." Post-vaccination antibody concentrations depended on pre-existing plasma cells and B cell memory as indicated by a strong positive relationship between post-vaccination antibodies and pre-vaccination antibodies as well as antibody-secreting cells. In contrast, antigen-specific T cell responses were not or only weakly associated with antibody concentrations. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that single shot vaccinations against tetanus and/or diphtheria do not lead to long-lasting immunity in many elderly persons despite administration at relatively short intervals. Sufficient antigen-specific B cell memory B generated by adequate priming and consecutive booster vaccinations and/or exposure is a prerequisite for long-term protection.

trial registrationEU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR); EudraCT number 2009-011742-26; www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2009-011742-26/AT.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHealth Services for the AgedImmunization, SecondaryAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic MemoryMaleMiddle AgedPlasma CellsTime FactorsT-LymphocytesAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID24349407
PMCPMC3859625
OpenAlexW2028507949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.