Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24349260›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Opposing roles of PKA and EPAC in the cAMP-dependent regulation of schwann cell proliferation and differentiation [corrected].

Ketty Bacallao, Paula V Monje

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Energy Regulation in Inflammatory Sarcopenia by the Purinergic System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Functional Significance of the Adcy10-Dependent Intracellular cAMP Compartments.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ketty BacallaoThe Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Paula V MonjeThe Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America ; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
University of Miami · US

Funding

CYTOLOGICAL STUDIES OF DEVELOPING &MATURE NEURONSR01NS009923 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BETHEA, JOHN ROLAND, BUNGE, MARY BARTLETT · 1985 to 2016
$5.1M
Phenotypic & Functional Analysis of Human Schwann Cells for Potency Assay DvlpmtR21NS084326 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MONJE, PAULA VIRGINIA · 2013 to 2014
$420k
NINDS NIH HHS NS009923NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS009923NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS084326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Schwann cells (SCs), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) not only induces differentiation into a myelinating SC-related phenotype, but also synergistically enhances the mitogenic action of growth factors such as neuregulin. To better understand the molecular mechanism by which cAMP exerts these apparently contradictory functions, we investigated the role of the two main effectors of cAMP, protein kinase A (PKA) and the exchange protein activated by cAMP (EPAC), on the proliferation and differentiation of both isolated and axon-related SCs. For these studies, a variety of PKA and EPAC agonists and antagonists were used, including pathway-selective analogs of cAMP and pharmacological inhibitors. Our studies indicated that the activity of PKA rather than EPAC was required for the adjuvant effect of cAMP on S-phase entry, whereas the activity of EPAC rather than PKA was required for SC differentiation and myelin formation. Even though selective EPAC activation had an overall anti-proliferative effect in SCs, it failed to drive the expression of Krox-20, a master regulator of myelination, and that of myelin-specific proteins and lipids, suggesting that EPAC activation was insufficient to drive a full differentiating response. Interestingly, inhibition of EPAC activity resulted in a drastic impairment of SC differentiation and myelin formation but not Krox-20 expression, which indicates an independent mechanism of Krox-20 regulation in response to cAMP. In conclusion, our data supports the idea that the outcome of cAMP signaling in SCs depends on the particular set of effectors activated. Whereas the mitogenic action of cAMP relies exclusively on PKA activity, the differentiating action of cAMP requires a PKA-independent (non-canonical) cAMP-specific pathway that is partially transduced by EPAC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SeparationColforsinCyclic AMPCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesEarly Growth Response Protein 2Enzyme ActivationGanglia, SpinalGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHydrazonesIntracellular SpaceIsoxazoles3-(5-tert-butylisoxazol-3-yl)-2-((3-chlorophenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxopropionitrileColforsinCyclic AMPCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesEarly Growth Response Protein 2Guanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHydrazonesIsoxazolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsRapgef3 protein, rat

Identifiers

PMID24349260
PMCPMC3859537
OpenAlexW2152519078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.