Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24349100›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Location and dynamics of the immunodominant CD8 T cell response to SIVΔnef immunization and SIVmac251 vaginal challenge.

Arun K Sasikala-Appukuttan, Hyeon O Kim, Nikilyn J Kinzel, Jung Joo Hong, Anthony J Smith, Reece Wagstaff, Cavan Reilly, Michael Piatak, Jeffrey D Lifson, R Keith Reeves and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Detection of Antigen-Specific T Cells Using In Situ MHC Tetramer Staining.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Mechanisms of CD8European journal of immunology · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arun K Sasikala-AppukuttanUniversity of Minnesota, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Hyeon O KimUniversity of Minnesota, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Nikilyn J KinzelUniversity of Minnesota, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Jung Joo HongUniversity of Minnesota, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Anthony J SmithUniversity of Minnesota, Microbiology Department, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Reece WagstaffUniversity of Minnesota, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Cavan ReillyUniversity of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Michael PiatakAIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., (formerly Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick, Inc.), Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Jeffrey D LifsonAIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., (formerly Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick, Inc.), Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
R Keith ReevesDivision of Immunology, New England Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Southborough, Massachusetts, United States of America.
R Paul JohnsonDivision of Immunology, New England Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Southborough, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ashley T HaaseUniversity of Minnesota, Microbiology Department, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Pamela J SkinnerUniversity of Minnesota, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
University of Minnesota · USHarvard University · US

Funding

ZETA CHAIN OF T CELL RECEPTOR INTERACTS W/ NEF OF SIV &HIV2P51RR000168 · NCRR · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WESTMORELAND, SUSAN V. · 1985 to 2011
$139.3M
New England Primate Research Center Base GrantP51OD011103 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI FLIER, JEFFREY S · 2012 to 2013
$24.7M
CTL Exclusion from Lymphoid Follicles as a Mechanism of Lentivirus Immune InvasioR56AI080418 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CONNICK, ELIZABETH, SKINNER, PAMELA J · 2010 to 2010
$750k
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000168NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI080418NIH HHS P51 OD011103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live-attenuated SIV vaccines (LAVs) have been the most effective to date in preventing or partially controlling infection by wild-type SIV in non-human primate models of HIV-1 transmission to women acting by mechanisms of protection that are not well understood. To gain insights into mechanisms of protection by LAVs that could aid development of effective vaccines to prevent HIV-1 transmission to women, we used in situ tetramer staining to determine whether increased densities or changes in the local distribution of SIV-specific CD8 T cells correlated with the maturation of SIVΔnef vaccine-induced protection prior to and after intra-vaginal challenge with wild-type SIVmac251. We evaluated the immunodominant Mamu-A1*001:01/Gag (CM9) and Mamu-A1*001:01/Tat (SL8) epitope response in genital and lymphoid tissues, and found that tetramer+ cells were present at all time points examined. In the cervical vaginal tissues, most tetramer+ cells were distributed diffusely throughout the lamina propria or co-localized with other CD8 T cells within lymphoid aggregates. The distribution and densities of the tetramer+ cells at the portal of entry did not correlate with the maturation of protection or change after challenge. Given these findings, we discuss the possibility that changes in other aspects of the immune system, including the quality of the resident population of virus-specific effector CD8 T cells could contribute to maturation of protection, as well as the potential for vaccine strategies that further increase the size and quality of this effector population to prevent HIV-1 transmission.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleGene DeletionGene ExpressionHumansImmunity, ActiveMacaca mulattaMucous MembraneSAIDS VaccinesSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedVaginaEpitopes, T-LymphocyteNEF protein, SIVSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedViral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24349100
PMCPMC3857218
OpenAlexW2145168743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.