Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24349039›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Tumor versus stromal cells in culture--survival of the fittest?

Krishna M Talasila, Narve Brekka, Kjersti Mangseth, Daniel Stieber, Lasse Evensen, Gro V Rosland, Anja Torsvik, Marek Wagner, Simone P Niclou, Rupavathana Mahesparan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Krishna M TalasilaDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Narve BrekkaDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kjersti MangsethDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Daniel StieberNorLux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé (CRP-Santé), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Lasse EvensenDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Gro V RoslandDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Anja TorsvikDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marek WagnerDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Simone P NiclouNorLux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé (CRP-Santé), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Rupavathana MahesparanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Olav K VintermyrDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Rolf BjerkvigDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway ; NorLux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé (CRP-Santé), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Janice M NigroDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hrvoje MileticDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway ; Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOLaboratoire National de Santé · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two of the signature genetic events that occur in human gliomas, EGFR amplification and IDH mutation, are poorly represented in experimental models in vitro. EGFR amplification, for example, occurs in 40 to 50% of GBM, and yet, EGFR amplification is rarely preserved in cell cultures derived from human tumors. To analyze the fate of EGFR amplified and IDH mutated cells in culture, we followed the development over time of cultures derived from human xenografts in nude rats enriched for tumor cells with EGFR amplification and of cultures derived from patient samples with IDH mutations, in serum monolayer and spheroid suspension culture, under serum and serum free conditions. We observed under serum monolayer conditions, that nestin positive or nestin and SMA double positive rat stromal cells outgrew EGFR amplified tumor cells, while serum spheroid cultures preserved tumor cells with EGFR amplification. Serum free suspension culture exhibited a more variable cell composition in that the resultant cell populations were either predominantly nestin/SOX2 co-expressing rat stromal cells or human tumor cells, or a mixture of both. The selection for nestin/SMA positive stromal cells under serum monolayer conditions was also consistently observed in human oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas with IDH mutations. Our results highlight for the first time that serum monolayer conditions can select for stromal cells instead of tumor cells in certain brain tumor subtypes. This result has an important impact on the establishment of new tumor cell cultures from brain tumors and raises the question of the proper conditions for the growth of the tumor cell populations of interest.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsGlioblastomaHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMutationOligodendrogliomaRatsStromal CellsTransplantation, HeterologousTumor Cells, CulturedErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID24349039
PMCPMC3857854
OpenAlexW2078690422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.