ArticleOpen medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal2013
Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.
Article in Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in driving distance to specialist physicians in the era of virtual care: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Trends colliding: Aging comprehensive family physicians and the growing complexity of their patients.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2025Article
- Am I attached? A patient-partnered approach to creating infographics about attachment to primary care in Ontario, Canada.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Patients report high information coordination between rostered primary care physicians and specialists: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Including patient-reported measures in performance evaluation systems: Patient contribution in assessing and improving the healthcare systems.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022Article
- Patient clustering in primary care settings: Outcomes and quality of care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Association of Early Physician Follow-up With Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Regional variations and associations between colonoscopy resource availability and colonoscopy utilisation: a population-based descriptive study in Ontario, Canada.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Non-Official Language Concordance in Urban Canadian Medical Practice: Implications for Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
- Variation in care of patients with elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Primary care physician volume and quality of care for older adults with dementia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- The impact of the diabetes management incentive on diabetes-related services: evidence from Ontario, Canada.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020Article
- Use of Cardiac Noninvasive Testing After Emergency Department Discharge: Association of Hospital Network Testing Intensity and Outcomes in Ontario, Canada.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Care coordination for severe mental health disorders: an analysis of healthcare provider patient-sharing networks and their association with quality of care in a French region.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Understanding unwarranted variation in clinical practice: a focus on network effects, reflective medicine and learning health systems.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2020Article
- ICES: Data, Discovery, Better Health.International journal of population data science · 2020Article
- Quantification of the resilience of primary care networks by stress testing the health care system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge multispecialty physician group practices, with a central role for primary care practitioners, have been shown to achieve high-quality, low-cost care for patients with chronic disease. We assessed the extent to which informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario could be identified by using health administrative data to exploit natural linkages among patients, physicians, and hospitals based on existing patient flow.
methodsWe linked each Ontario resident to his or her usual provider of primary care over the period from fiscal year 2008/2009 to fiscal year 2010/2011. We linked each specialist to the hospital where he or she performed the most inpatient services. We linked each primary care physician to the hospital where most of his or her ambulatory patients were admitted for non-maternal medical care. Each resident was then linked to the same hospital as his or her usual provider of primary care. We computed "loyalty" as the proportion of care to network residents provided by physicians and hospitals within their network. Smaller clusters were aggregated to create networks based on a minimum population size, distance, and loyalty. Networks were not constrained geographically.
resultsWe identified 78 multispecialty physician networks, comprising 12,410 primary care physicians, 14,687 specialists, and 175 acute care hospitals serving a total of 12,917,178 people. Median network size was 134,723 residents, 125 primary care physicians, and 143 specialists. Virtually all eligible residents were linked to a usual provider of primary care and to a network. Most specialists (93.5%) and primary care physicians (98.2%) were linked to a hospital. Median network physician loyalty was 68.4% for all physician visits and 81.1% for primary care visits. Median non-maternal admission loyalty was 67.4%. Urban networks had lower loyalties and were less self-contained but had more health care resources.
interpretationWe demonstrated the feasibility of identifying informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario on the basis of patterns of health care-seeking behaviour. Networks were reasonably self-contained, in that individual residents received most of their care from providers within their respective networks. Formal constitution of networks could foster accountability for efficient, integrated care through care management tools and quality improvement, the ideas behind "accountable care organizations."
Indexed as
Identifiers
24348884PMC3863751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.