Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348884›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal2013

Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.

Therese A Stukel, Richard H Glazier, Susan E Schultz, Jun Guan, Brandon M Zagorski, Peter Gozdyra, David A Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Changes in driving distance to specialist physicians in the era of virtual care: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient clustering in primary care settings: Outcomes and quality of care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The impact of the diabetes management incentive on diabetes-related services: evidence from Ontario, Canada.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Understanding unwarranted variation in clinical practice: a focus on network effects, reflective medicine and learning health systems.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2020
    Article
  18. ICES: Data, Discovery, Better Health.International journal of population data science · 2020
    Article
  19. Quantification of the resilience of primary care networks by stress testing the health care system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Therese A Stukel
Richard H Glazier
Susan E Schultz
Jun Guan
Brandon M Zagorski
Peter Gozdyra
David A Henry

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge multispecialty physician group practices, with a central role for primary care practitioners, have been shown to achieve high-quality, low-cost care for patients with chronic disease. We assessed the extent to which informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario could be identified by using health administrative data to exploit natural linkages among patients, physicians, and hospitals based on existing patient flow.

methodsWe linked each Ontario resident to his or her usual provider of primary care over the period from fiscal year 2008/2009 to fiscal year 2010/2011. We linked each specialist to the hospital where he or she performed the most inpatient services. We linked each primary care physician to the hospital where most of his or her ambulatory patients were admitted for non-maternal medical care. Each resident was then linked to the same hospital as his or her usual provider of primary care. We computed "loyalty" as the proportion of care to network residents provided by physicians and hospitals within their network. Smaller clusters were aggregated to create networks based on a minimum population size, distance, and loyalty. Networks were not constrained geographically.

resultsWe identified 78 multispecialty physician networks, comprising 12,410 primary care physicians, 14,687 specialists, and 175 acute care hospitals serving a total of 12,917,178 people. Median network size was 134,723 residents, 125 primary care physicians, and 143 specialists. Virtually all eligible residents were linked to a usual provider of primary care and to a network. Most specialists (93.5%) and primary care physicians (98.2%) were linked to a hospital. Median network physician loyalty was 68.4% for all physician visits and 81.1% for primary care visits. Median non-maternal admission loyalty was 67.4%. Urban networks had lower loyalties and were less self-contained but had more health care resources.

interpretationWe demonstrated the feasibility of identifying informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario on the basis of patterns of health care-seeking behaviour. Networks were reasonably self-contained, in that individual residents received most of their care from providers within their respective networks. Formal constitution of networks could foster accountability for efficient, integrated care through care management tools and quality improvement, the ideas behind "accountable care organizations."

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsChronic DiseaseCluster AnalysisCommunity NetworksDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDisease ManagementGroup PracticeHospital-Physician RelationsHumansInterprofessional RelationsMedical Record LinkageOntarioPatient Care TeamPhysiciansPrimary Health CareSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID24348884
PMCPMC3863751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.