Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348631›Full record

ArticleDental research journal2013

Treatment strategy for guided tissue regeneration in various class II furcation defect: Case series.

Pushpendra Kumar Verma, Ruchi Srivastava, K K Gupta, T P Chaturvedi

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Dental research journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pushpendra Kumar VermaFaculty of Dental Sciences, I.M.S., Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ruchi SrivastavaFaculty of Dental Sciences, I.M.S., Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
K K GuptaDepartment of Periodontology & Implantology, Sardar Patel Post-graduate Institute of Dental & Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
T P ChaturvediFaculty of Dental Sciences, I.M.S., Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Banaras Hindu University · INSardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontal regeneration is a main aspect in the treatment of teeth affected by periodontitis. Periodontal regeneration in furcation areas is quite challenging, especially when it is in interproximal region. There are several techniques used alone or in combination considered to achieve periodontal regeneration, including the bone grafts or substitutes, guided tissue regeneration (GTR), root surface modification, and biological mediators. Many factors may account for variability in response to regenerative therapy in class II furcation. This case series describes the management of class II furcation defect in a mesial interproximal region of a maxillary tooth and other with a buccal class II furcation of mandibular tooth, with the help of surgical intervention including the GTR membrane and bone graft materials. This combined treatment resulted in healthy periodontium with a radiographic evidence of alveolar bone gain in both cases. This case series demonstrates that proper diagnosis, followed by removal of etiological factors and utilizing the combined treatment modalities will restore health and function of the tooth with the severe attachment loss.

Indexed as

Class II furcationguided tissue regenerationmaxillary mesial furcation

Identifiers

PMID24348631
PMCPMC3858748
OpenAlexW2095724209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.