Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348475›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2013

Adjuvants are Key Factors for the Development of Future Vaccines: Lessons from the Finlay Adjuvant Platform.

Oliver Pérez, Belkis Romeu, Osmir Cabrera, Elizabeth González, Alexander Batista-Duharte, Alexis Labrada, Rocmira Pérez, Laura M Reyes, Wendy Ramírez, Sergio Sifontes and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A review on the recent advances and application of vaccines against fish pathogens in aquaculture.Aquaculture international : journal of the European Aquaculture Society · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Developments in Vaccine Adjuvants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Vaccines · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of a RecombinantFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver PérezImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba ; Havana Medical Sciences University , Havana , Cuba.
Belkis RomeuImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba.
Osmir CabreraImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba.
Elizabeth GonzálezImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba.
Alexander Batista-DuharteToxicology and Biomedicine Center (TOXIMED), Medical Sciences University Santiago de Cuba , Santiago de Cuba , Cuba.
Alexis LabradaCentro Nacional de Biopreparados (BioCen) , Mayabeque , Cuba.
Rocmira PérezImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba.
Laura M ReyesImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba.
Wendy RamírezCentro Nacional de Biopreparados (BioCen) , Mayabeque , Cuba.
Sergio SifontesCentro de Bioactivos Químicos (CBQ), Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas , Villa Clara , Cuba.
Nelson FernándezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex , Essex , UK.
Miriam LastreImmunology Department, Research and Development Vice-presidency, Finlay Institute , Havana , Cuba.
Finlay Institute · CUCentro Nacional de Biopreparados (Cuba) · CUUniversidad Central "Marta Abreu" de las Villas (UCLV) · CUUniversidad de Oriente · CUUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective vaccines against neglected diseases, especially those associated with poverty and social deprivation, is urgently needed. Modern vaccine technologies and a better understanding of the immune response have provided scientists with the tools for rational and safer design of subunit vaccines. Often, however, subunit vaccines do not elicit strong immune responses, highlighting the need to incorporate better adjuvants; this step therefore becomes a key factor for vaccine development. In this review we outline some key features of modern vaccinology that are linked with the development of better adjuvants. In line with the increased desire to obtain novel adjuvants for future vaccines, the Finlay Adjuvant Platform offers a novel approach for the development of new and effective adjuvants. The Finlay Adjuvants (AFs), AFPL (proteoliposome), and AFCo (cochleate), were initially designed for parenteral and mucosal applications, and constitute potent adjuvants for the induction of Th1 responses against several antigens. This review summarizes the status of the Finlay technology in producing promising adjuvants for unsolved-vaccine diseases including mucosal approaches and therapeutic vaccines. Ideas related to adjuvant classification, adjuvant selection, and their possible influence on innate recognition via multiple toll-like receptors are also discussed.

Indexed as

adjuvantallergencochleatefishproteoliposomevaccine

Identifiers

PMID24348475
PMCPMC3845353
OpenAlexW2093708744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.