Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348470›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2013

Biological CO2 conversion to acetate in subsurface coal-sand formation using a high-pressure reactor system.

Yoko Ohtomo, Akira Ijiri, Yojiro Ikegawa, Masazumi Tsutsumi, Hiroyuki Imachi, Go-Ichiro Uramoto, Tatsuhiko Hoshino, Yuki Morono, Sanae Sakai, Yumi Saito and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. High-pressure continuous culturing: life at the extreme.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbial growth under supercritical CO2.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoko OhtomoKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Akira IjiriKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Yojiro IkegawaSubmarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Civil Engineering Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry Chiba, Japan.
Masazumi TsutsumiKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Hiroyuki ImachiSubmarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Institute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Yokosuka, Japan.
Go-Ichiro UramotoKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Tatsuhiko HoshinoKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Yuki MoronoKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Sanae SakaiInstitute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Yokosuka, Japan.
Yumi SaitoInstitute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Yokosuka, Japan.
Wataru TanikawaKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Takehiro HiroseKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Fumio InagakiKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan ; Submarine Resources Research Project, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Kochi, Japan.
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geological CO2 sequestration in unmineable subsurface oil/gas fields and coal formations has been proposed as a means of reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. However, the feasibility of injecting CO2 into subsurface depends upon a variety of geological and economic conditions, and the ecological consequences are largely unpredictable. In this study, we developed a new flow-through-type reactor system to examine potential geophysical, geochemical and microbiological impacts associated with CO2 injection by simulating in-situ pressure (0-100 MPa) and temperature (0-70°C) conditions. Using the reactor system, anaerobic artificial fluid and CO2 (flow rate: 0.002 and 0.00001 ml/min, respectively) were continuously supplemented into a column comprised of bituminous coal and sand under a pore pressure of 40 MPa (confined pressure: 41 MPa) at 40°C for 56 days. 16S rRNA gene analysis of the bacterial components showed distinct spatial separation of the predominant taxa in the coal and sand over the course of the experiment. Cultivation experiments using sub-sampled fluids revealed that some microbes survived, or were metabolically active, under CO2-rich conditions. However, no methanogens were activated during the experiment, even though hydrogenotrophic and methylotrophic methanogens were obtained from conventional batch-type cultivation at 20°C. During the reactor experiment, the acetate and methanol concentration in the fluids increased while the δ(13)Cacetate, H2 and CO2 concentrations decreased, indicating the occurrence of homo-acetogenesis. 16S rRNA genes of homo-acetogenic spore-forming bacteria related to the genus Sporomusa were consistently detected from the sandstone after the reactor experiment. Our results suggest that the injection of CO2 into a natural coal-sand formation preferentially stimulates homo-acetogenesis rather than methanogenesis, and that this process is accompanied by biogenic CO2 conversion to acetate.

Indexed as

bituminous coalcoal-bed methanegeobio-reactor systemgeological CO2 sequestrationhomo-acetogenesismethanogen

Identifiers

PMID24348470
PMCPMC3845345
OpenAlexW2097161004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.