Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348340›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2013

Japanese studies on neural circuits and behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Hiroyuki Sasakura, Yuki Tsukada, Shin Takagi, Ikue Mori

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Neural circuits: Japan.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroyuki SasakuraLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Yuki TsukadaLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Shin TakagiLaboratory of Brain Function and Structure, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Ikue MoriLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Division of Biological Science, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is an ideal organism for studying neural plasticity and animal behaviors. A total of 302 neurons of a C. elegans hermaphrodite have been classified into 118 neuronal groups. This simple neural circuit provides a solid basis for understanding the mechanisms of the brains of higher animals, including humans. Recent studies that employ modern imaging and manipulation techniques enable researchers to study the dynamic properties of nervous systems with great precision. Behavioral and molecular genetic analyses of this tiny animal have contributed greatly to the advancement of neural circuit research. Here, we will review the recent studies on the neural circuits of C. elegans that have been conducted in Japan. Several laboratories have established unique and clever methods to study the underlying neuronal substrates of behavioral regulation in C. elegans. The technological advances applied to studies of C. elegans have allowed new approaches for the studies of complex neural systems. Through reviewing the studies on the neuronal circuits of C. elegans in Japan, we will analyze and discuss the directions of neural circuit studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansJapanNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsbehavioral geneticsC. eleganslearning and memoryneural circuitsplastic behaviorstudies on Japan

Identifiers

PMID24348340
PMCPMC3842693
OpenAlexW2141582276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.