Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348265›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Genetic recombination is targeted towards gene promoter regions in dogs.

Adam Auton, Ying Rui Li, Jeffrey Kidd, Kyle Oliveira, Julie Nadel, J Kim Holloway, Jessica J Hayward, Paula E Cohen, John M Greally, Jun Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Meiotic Recombination in Teleosts.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Fine-scale recombination rates inferred using the canFam4 assembly are strongly correlated with previous maps of dog recombination.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam AutonDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ying Rui LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jeffrey KiddDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Kyle OliveiraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Julie NadelDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
J Kim HollowayDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Jessica J HaywardDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Paula E CohenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
John M GreallyDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jun WangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Carlos D BustamanteDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Adam R BoykoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USNew York State College of Veterinary Medicine · USBGI Group (China) · CNCornell University · USMichigan United · USStanford University · US

Funding

Functional Analysis of the Dual Specificity Kinase NEK1 in Mammalian MeiosisR00HD065870 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HOLLOWAY, JOANNA KIM · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD065870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of the H3K4 trimethylase, PRDM9, as the gene responsible for recombination hotspot localization has provided considerable insight into the mechanisms by which recombination is initiated in mammals. However, uniquely amongst mammals, canids appear to lack a functional version of PRDM9 and may therefore provide a model for understanding recombination that occurs in the absence of PRDM9, and thus how PRDM9 functions to shape the recombination landscape. We have constructed a fine-scale genetic map from patterns of linkage disequilibrium assessed using high-throughput sequence data from 51 free-ranging dogs, Canis lupus familiaris. While broad-scale properties of recombination appear similar to other mammalian species, our fine-scale estimates indicate that canine highly elevated recombination rates are observed in the vicinity of CpG rich regions including gene promoter regions, but show little association with H3K4 trimethylation marks identified in spermatocytes. By comparison to genomic data from the Andean fox, Lycalopex culpaeus, we show that biased gene conversion is a plausible mechanism by which the high CpG content of the dog genome could have occurred.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene ConversionPromoter Regions, GeneticRecombination, GeneticAnimalsChromosome MappingCpG IslandsDogsGenetic Association StudiesGenomeHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseLinkage DisequilibriumHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferasePRDM9 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24348265
PMCPMC3861134
OpenAlexW1967686316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.