Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348259›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Wolbachia variants induce differential protection to viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: a phenotypic and phylogenomic analysis.

Ewa Chrostek, Marta S P Marialva, Sara S Esteves, Lucy A Weinert, Julien Martinez, Francis M Jiggins, Luis Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Climate predictsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. mBio · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Counting rareMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  9. Time-Restricted Feeding Promotes Longevity and Gut Health Without Fitness Trade-Offs.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ewa ChrostekInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Marta S P MarialvaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Sara S EstevesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Lucy A WeinertDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Julien MartinezDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Francis M JigginsDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Luis TeixeiraInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia are intracellular bacterial symbionts that are able to protect various insect hosts from viral infections. This tripartite interaction was initially described in Drosophila melanogaster carrying wMel, its natural Wolbachia strain. wMel has been shown to be genetically polymorphic and there has been a recent change in variant frequencies in natural populations. We have compared the antiviral protection conferred by different wMel variants, their titres and influence on host longevity, in a genetically identical D. melanogaster host. The phenotypes cluster the variants into two groups--wMelCS-like and wMel-like. wMelCS-like variants give stronger protection against Drosophila C virus and Flock House virus, reach higher titres and often shorten the host lifespan. We have sequenced and assembled the genomes of these Wolbachia, and shown that the two phenotypic groups are two monophyletic groups. We have also analysed a virulent and over-replicating variant, wMelPop, which protects D. melanogaster even better than the closely related wMelCS. We have found that a ~21 kb region of the genome, encoding eight genes, is amplified seven times in wMelPop and may be the cause of its phenotypes. Our results indicate that the more protective wMelCS-like variants, which sometimes have a cost, were replaced by the less protective but more benign wMel-like variants. This has resulted in a recent reduction in virus resistance in D. melanogaster in natural populations worldwide. Our work helps to understand the natural variation in wMel and its evolutionary dynamics, and inform the use of Wolbachia in arthropod-borne disease control.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGenome, InsectGenomicsInsect VirusesLongevityPhenotypePhylogenyVirus DiseasesWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID24348259
PMCPMC3861217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.